Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Shear and the distance d

Shear and the distance d

Shear and the distance d

Regardless of reinforced masonry or concrete the shear requirement from the face of the support to a distance of d from the support is the shear at the distance d for a flexural member. Several conditions one of which is, no CONCENTRATED load can be within the distance d. Fine. If you are designing a lintel or header over an opening in a wall and you have a concentrated point load above at the top of the wall, say a reaction from an OWSJ, the general procedure is to distribute this point load at an angle of 60 degrees until a prescribed maximum width is reached thus converting the concentrated point load into a uniformly distributed load. And lets say in this case an OWSJ reaction is with in the distance d from the edge of the lintel/beam or opening. Question is, is this a concentrated load? Does the requirement of utilizing the shear value at a distance d apply or not? Thanks.

RE: Shear and the distance d

It is a concentrated load. The only debate is if it is sufficiently large copmpared to the other loading to require checking at the face of the support.

Depending on which code you are using, this is not necessarily onerous. For the Australian code AS3600 and British code BS8110, there is a factor that increases shear capacity in this zone anyway so you are not being disadvantaged.

The only other option would be strut-tie analysis and design.

RE: Shear and the distance d

We usually run lines up diagonally from the opening corners to form a triangular wedge of loading on the lintel. If this triangle is interrupted by the top of wall level (joist bearing level) then the joists are treated as individual concentrated loads instead of spread-out uniform loads. In that case we'd then possibly have a concentrated load within d from the support.

If not, the loads are considered to be spread out enough such that the reduced shear can be used.

RE: Shear and the distance d

I agree with JAE. I do it that way also.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close