Site Response Analysis for Site Class F - Catch-22?
Site Response Analysis for Site Class F - Catch-22?
(OP)
Hi All,
I have done a shear wave study of a site that gives a 1-D profile with V100 that puts it in site class D. However, there is a layer of organic material in one boring that would put the site automatically in class F, and require a site response analysis. So, in the site response analysis, I need to use a Shear wave velocity profile (got it...see above), but it is a class D profile. Question - can I do a probabilistic analysis (e.g. USGS data), or do I need to do a specific one (e.g. SHAKE)? If I do SHAKE, the input Vs profile (as measured on the site) will be a class D profile, so why can I not just do a probabilistic analysis assuming class D? A bit of a logic loop...or am I missing something.
Thanks for any advice.
Tim
I have done a shear wave study of a site that gives a 1-D profile with V100 that puts it in site class D. However, there is a layer of organic material in one boring that would put the site automatically in class F, and require a site response analysis. So, in the site response analysis, I need to use a Shear wave velocity profile (got it...see above), but it is a class D profile. Question - can I do a probabilistic analysis (e.g. USGS data), or do I need to do a specific one (e.g. SHAKE)? If I do SHAKE, the input Vs profile (as measured on the site) will be a class D profile, so why can I not just do a probabilistic analysis assuming class D? A bit of a logic loop...or am I missing something.
Thanks for any advice.
Tim
RE: Site Response Analysis for Site Class F - Catch-22?