×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

(OP)
Hello,

I am performing Tank re-rates and basic API-650/653 calculations for clients along the Gulf Coast. Almost all of the clients have a Hurricane preparedness procedure that involves filling their tanks to a recommended liquid level to provide overturning stability and additional stiffness to counteract the possibility of an elevated external pressure situation. I have developed a nice spreadsheet that takes care of most of this but I am now trying to incorporate this "Additional" liquid level calculation so I can recommend an liquid level to clients.

The second overturning condition of API-650 uses the M(f) term for fluid weight and determines the maximum liquid hold down moment based on a band of fluid a certain distance inward from the wall. I understand that this is supposed to account for the fact that the floor plate is relatively weak and acts as a membrane and after a certain point will begin to diaphragm thereby lifting the tank.

I have been instructed to just add the weight of the additional liquid level directly to the dead load and I believe this to be incorrect.

My question for you is: How can I correctly take into account additional liquid level to combat overturning ?

Thank You in advance for any input...

RE: Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

Based on experience from hurricane Sandy, stability was an issue but also buoyancy when the dike was filled with water. Some tank dikes were filled and the water kept rising, floating tanks out of the diked area. To be truly prepared you may want to consider filling the tanks to prevent them from becoming boats.

RE: Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

If you KNEW the tank was going to be full, you could reasonably use the same overturning resistance due to liquid as is used for seismic design. The allowance given for resistance to wind loading is assuming that minimum fill and maximum wind are less likely to occur simultaneously, and also requires a larger factor of safety when checking for this condition.

RE: Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

(OP)
Thank You, I will look into the seismic overturning section. We never use appendix E, it looks like it may have what I need.

RE: Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

And don't forget buoyancy. The 'odds' of having your dike fill with stormwater is much higher than your odds of having to withstand even a Category 3 hurricane-force winds. Sandy wasn't even a Cat-1, and the storm surge was tremendous.

Also, you can 'think outside the box' and deliberately add water to your hydrocarbon tanks if the contents are not misciable with water. A tank with a water-fill up to the top of the dike, and a few feet of oil on the oil is much easier to accomplish than finding enough oil to fill that tank full enough that a dike-full of water won't float it. Or to convince your EPA-compliance guy/gal that you REALLY need to cut notches in your tank dikes to limit the stormwater fill level.

RE: Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

(OP)
I am currently using some non-linear FEA models to develop a relationship between additional liquid level and usable hold-down load. I will post my results at a later time.

RE: Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

We will look forward to the results, sir/ma'am.

RE: Minimum Liquid Level to Mitigate Overturning...

i am looking forward to those results too. earlier in my career, i had recommended minimum levels for overturning weight, and came up with the same question you posted clowerymech... i suspect this is not a bad assumption for small diameter (<15')tanks but at 40+ diameters i'm not so sure.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now