×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

AS 1940 Crest Locus tank/bund interpretation

AS 1940 Crest Locus tank/bund interpretation

AS 1940 Crest Locus tank/bund interpretation

(OP)
Hello all,

I am interested to know how any of you may have interpreted and applied Clause 5.8.3(h) of Australian Standard AS 1940 The storage and handling of flammable and combustible liquids.

The clause reads as follows:

"The location of a bund relative to the closest tank shall be such that the top inside perimeter of the bund is not inside the crest locus limit specified in Figure 5.2, except where it can be demonstrated that a reduced distance would be appropriate due to viscosity or other considerations." I have attached Figure 5.2 from the standard.

So if you look at the figure, it seems pretty straight forward that 1 metre minimum horizontal separation between the tank and its bund wall is required for bulk storages of flammable and combustible liquids - and potentially greater separation is required if the crest locus calculation shows this. Straight forward that is until you find that many *apparently* AS 1940 compliant tank/bund packages on the market have less than 1m horizontal separation between the storage tank and its bund wall.

This is just a sanity check that I am interpreting these requirements properly. Is there another way to interpret the clause - for example, that the crest locus is the hypotenuse of the triangle and not the base...

Anyways, sorry for the boring technicalities above and hope there is someone who can help.

Thanks,
Paul

RE: AS 1940 Crest Locus tank/bund interpretation

Could it be the "or other considerations" kicking in? Perhaps people were able to show that if their tank configuration failed, a lesser distance was okay?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now