Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Useful FMEA software package

Useful FMEA software package

Useful FMEA software package


I think this forum has many knowledgable members, compared to many...

We need some software to manage & document our FMEAs (Design & Process). At the moment we use Excel templates, which are time-consuming to manage.

Can anyone recommend a dedicated FMEA software package we should evaluate? We'd need a maximum price around $500 (US).

Thanks in advance, Ian

RE: Useful FMEA software package

In almost every project I've been invovled with has jad its own flavour of FMEA.
Everyone seems to have a criticism of someone else's FMEA practice.
I'd agree, go with Excel and be flexible in reorganising the format as the project progresses.


RE: Useful FMEA software package

Just to revisit this thread with a few questions...

Given a fairly normal FMEA data capture as follows:

Failure Modes
Preventive Action
Detection Action

How would you recommend structuring the one->many / many->one relationships? I've seen a few conflicting examples, e.g:

Unique failure mode data entry -> Many (repeated) effects data entries -> Many more (repeated) cause data entries


Many (repeated) failure mode data entries -> Unique effects data entry -> Many more (repeated) cause data entries

This choice seems to impact the formatting of the FMEA quite considerably...

Thanks, Ian

RE: Useful FMEA software package

One way I've seen it handled for real engineering situations is to use a lookup table rather than a simple grid, but for FMEAs I've only seen cut and paste. I think this rather poor quality solutionis one of the many why FMEAs tend to be regarded as makework rather than useful tools.


Greg Locock

New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: Useful FMEA software package

Very true Greg.
My first FMEA endeavour was pencil and paper, albeit the Company pro-forma, back in 1979, and I was the wrong person to be doing it - the right people (component engineers) didn't see the point - they were experts, of course.
All the subsequent screw ups had not been captured in the FMEAs. At least it was easy to update - eraser and mechanical pencil and a draftsmans script.
I've seen little progress. I've seen FMEAs done using Oracle and what a disaster that was. After an initial bout of enthusiasm, the object of FMEA was lost in the beligerance of the Oracle software and component engineers resorted to bits of paper and keeping them in their desks.

I quite like to use a sensible layout using Excel and hyperlinks to supporting documentation and evidence (test results, vendor reports, development plans, etc.)

Someone responsible for system function needs to be responsible for construction and control. This someone needs to be a properly experienced engineer, not a promoted administrator.


RE: Useful FMEA software package

Perhaps an amateur suggestion, but the safety engineer I worked with on a current project used the free SISTEMA software for the functional safety analysis of the system we were designing. It sounded to me as if it could be somewhat useful for FMEA's (NOTE: I haven't used the software, just going off the outcomes he gave us from his analysis of our circuits it seemed like that was what it ).

Another department where I work use RCM software (reliability centered maintenance) - not sure which one, but they explained it to me as FMEA with a spot to include failure rates of components if we wanted to. Again, could be useful, although I think its a pretty expensive approach (guessing at thousands for software licences).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close