×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

ACI 318 Appendix D - Shear D.6

ACI 318 Appendix D - Shear D.6

(OP)
The equation for Avo is based on a large concrete section and uses the edge distance to calculate the area. Looking at a foundation such that the edge distance is very large compared to the depth. In calculating Av it will be limited by this depth. Thus the ratio of Av / Avo used in eq. D-20 or D-21 will be small, reducing the anchor(s) nominal strength. In the commentary text is a mention that for large edge distances the concrete failures will probably not govern.

Is it legitimate to limit Avo by using the depth (h) as the vertical component of the area instead of the edge distance (1.5c1)? Or is this check not necessary as suggested in the commentary?

ex. 10'x10'x18" footing. c1 is about 60", h = 18". D-22 --> Avo = 16200 sq in. Av = 3240 sq in [ig RD.6.2.1(b)] Thus Av / Avo = 0.2

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!