×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

CTS antenna and Thinkom

CTS antenna and Thinkom

CTS antenna and Thinkom

(OP)
Do anybody hear about the Continuous Transverse Stub (CTS) antenna or Thinkom before? This antenna look like the best candidate for the millimeter integrated radio, depicted as 50% wider in bandwidth, 20% higher in efficiency, 6 to 15 dB lower in sidelobes, 70% lower in profile, 40% lighter in weight, and 50% lower in cost than the shrouded- and steep taper-parabolic dishes it replaces.
But The ThinKom claims completely own the intellectual property of CTS antenna. I want to know if there is some other company also provide this kind of antenna.
Related pdf is attached

RE: CTS antenna and Thinkom

The three page brochure lacks detail. It appears to be a phased array, but with what they claim is a superior concept and improved implementation of the feed network behind the radiators.

The bandwidth shown in the graphs (37 to 40 GHz) as a percentage bandwidth is good, but not amazing. At these frequencies, the loss is typically so high that VSWR itself is rarely a direct problem. But loss is so high that one wouldn't want to exacerbate it with high VSWR.

Being extremely high gain, they're obviously intended for fixed point-to-point links. Such applications are often installed in locations (e.g. part way up a tower) such that a simple dish installation is perfectly acceptable. Obviously the mm-wave radio itself needs to installed right there, or preferably integrated, to mimimize loss.

If it's really "50% less expensive" than the alternative technologies, then there's no need to avoid them.

"Invented in 1991" is 21 years ago. Not many were working in mm-wave radio (e.g. 40 GHz) in 1991. Some, researchers, but not many.

Their earliest patents must be getting ripe by now. Of course, they'll have layered on additional patents in the meantime. If you can find their patents at USPTO.gov, then you could follow the links (prior art, both backwards and forwards) to find others working in the same niche.

As a system designer, you could pretend to ignore the technology inside their antenna subsystem and simply focus on the performance (air interface, physical characteristics, etc.)
 

RE: CTS antenna and Thinkom

US Patent 5266961 reportedly expired at the end of Aug 2011.


Here's another one: http://www.google.com/patents/US5771567

Notice the 'Citations' and 'Referenced By' sections. The 'Referenced By' list leads you forward in time to the others in the same niche.
 

RE: CTS antenna and Thinkom

This array is Linear polarization, perpindicular to mounting surface. For similarity, picture a yagi antenna V pole oriented, atop a table that's simply rotated with Az over El rotator mechanics.

At zenith, its polarization is dependent on the azimuth pointing direction, so it can be rotating linear at zenith.
 
It needs a polarizer for circular polarization since it's inherently linear polarization.

It can do endfire V pole efficiently, but to get H pole or good circular, it'd have to sit up high above the surface that it's mounting on.  

Looks like a good option for higher frequencies due to the lower loss in the distribuiton across the aperture with it's slow wave structure.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close