I would appreciate if somebody could weigh in their opinion regarding the quality of Structurepoint's structural software, in particular spColumn, spMats and spFrame (previously PCA-Column, PCA-Mats and PCA-Frame). My employer has requested from me making an evaluation of these products. I want to give an educated opinion, which would not be too subjective. I have downloaded (www.structurepoint.org) their evaluation copies and did my homework. It seems to me that these programs are somewhat outdated technologically. Not only GUI interface looks very archaic, but some of the calculation features are limited too. For example 10k elements limitation for spMats and its rectilinear meshing allow only for very basic modeling. All the software's seem so inconvenient to use. I understand that Structurepoint software's are not expensive, perhaps a bargain, but at the same time I would not want to rely on something which is obsolete or poor quality. Do they run stable and are they bug free at least? How about Tech Support? Any ideas and suggestions?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
Manufacturers are at a critical juncture. Either they evolve their product processes or get disrupted by new competitors who have been built from the ground up to develop complex systems and products defined by software. Download Now
Savvy engineers have eagerly anticipated the impact of virtual reality (VR) on robot programming technology, as it can dramatically increase productivity by empowering engineers to do their jobs safer and more efficiently. Download Now