Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Preliminary Earthquake Loads for Universal Frames

Preliminary Earthquake Loads for Universal Frames

Preliminary Earthquake Loads for Universal Frames


I'm designing a 1-story platform that can pretty much be located anywhere in the world. As a rule of thumb, I was informed to use seismic load of 40% times the Dead Weight of the structure. There will be cases where there is/isn't earthquake (50-50). Since there are no PE's in the company, and that our firm usually outsources the PE procedures, is it ok to follow this type of procedure for initial design phase?


RE: Preliminary Earthquake Loads for Universal Frames

I think you'll need to give us a little more information.  I'm assuming this is a platform that will be located at the ground level?

What I've done in the past when unsure of where something (equipment for example) will be located I have designed using the highest SDS that I have found in ASCE 7 which I believe is somewhere around 3.0 g.  This is obviously conservative and may be overly so for you.  I would then suggest calculating the seismic forces in ASCE 7 using that SDS.  Your R value that you use for your structure will have a huge impact on whether or not 40% times the dead weight is reasonable or not.

I would then very EXPLICITLY write on the drawings the exact seismic design values that you used for the calculations.  I would then box this information on your drawings with a big bold note that the Engineer of Record for the building is to verify that your assumed seismic loading is applicable to the installation for their region.

If you are just looking at cost estimating purposes 40% may not be off depending on what type of platform it is (i.e. moment frame, tension bracing, etc).

RE: Preliminary Earthquake Loads for Universal Frames


Besides the lateral force demand that you use there are other, more important aspects of seismic design.  Specifically the connections need to be properly designed, more robust than the members.  The braces too must be upsized.  All of this depends a lot on the type of bracing system or moment frame system you use.  

For initial design phase, though, the 40% sounds "enough".  jdgengineer's suggestions are good.


RE: Preliminary Earthquake Loads for Universal Frames

Thanks JAE and jdgengineer.

Yea, I remember using ASCE 7 for calculating the base shear for this matter. I just wasn't sure of what a conservative SDS value was. During school, I've used SDS values close to 1.0g for downtown San Diego.

Appreciate the help!


RE: Preliminary Earthquake Loads for Universal Frames

My guess is 40% would cover at least 99% of you apps.  But do as JD and JAE suggest.... Check it out.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Smart Manufacturing for Electronics
This white paper describes a transformative approach to electronics manufacturing made possible by the addition of Mentor Graphics to the Siemens family. It describes a completely digitalized strategy that supports both printed circuit board (PCB) and mechanical design and manufacturing, uniting the entire product lifecycle – from idea and production to customers and back. Download Now
White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close