×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Difference between ASCE-07 and IS 1893-2002 Part I

Difference between ASCE-07 and IS 1893-2002 Part I

(OP)
Hi guys,
I am currently comparing ASCE-07 and IS 1893-2002 Part I ,and designing 12 storey building in both USA and INDIA as a part of my project.I want you guys to help me with some questions mentioned:

1) There is no provision in IS 1893 which states that for analysis we should use cracked moment of inertia of concrete beams and columns.Where as ACI-08 does give minimum cracked section inertias as Ic=0.7Ig for columns ans Ic=0.35Ig for beams.So what should be done in case of Indian code?should we use gross(Ig) wont it be on a conservative side?
2) Also according to storey drift clause 7.11.1 the 0.004 H minimum storey drift refer to elastic or inelastic deformation?,For ASCE-07 a factor Cd is multiplied to the elastic deformations to get inelastic deformations.

Also for storey drift which load combination should be used?

RE: Difference between ASCE-07 and IS 1893-2002 Part I

1) The material properties to be used in the analysis is typically given by the codes / standards pertaining to that material. If there are no guidelines, you may analyze first without any reduction in stiffness and later with 50% stiffness for all the elements to account for cracking. Of course, this is a very simplified and crude way.
2) Ref ASCE 7-05. Seismic is more about strength and stability and therefore there are no serviceability deflection criterion per se. The drift is calculated under strength level seismic forces based on the computed period of the structure without the upper limit Cu.Ta specified in Section 12.8.2. The amplified drift is obtained by multiplying  by Cd / I and compared with allowable story drifts as given in the Table 12.12-1. There is no load combination for checking drift, just the strength level seismic forces calculated using Section 12.8.6.2.
However, a drift analysis is not complete without performing a P-Delta check for which you can refer to section 12.8.7.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Resources

White Paper - Addressing Tooling and Casting Requirements at the Design Stage
Several of the tooling and casting requirements of a part can be addressed at the design stage. If these requirements are not addressed at the design stage, lot of time is spent in design iteration when the design reaches the die caster. These design issues lead to increase in time and cost of production leading to delay in time to market and reduced profits for the organization. Download Now
White Paper - The Other Side of Design for Assembly
Assembly level constraints need to be satisfied before the design can move downstream. This white paper will go through the various assembly level issues, which need to be tackled by various organizations on a regular basis. Know more about DFMPro, a design for assembly software. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!