×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Peat Consolidation Characteristics

Peat Consolidation Characteristics

Peat Consolidation Characteristics

(OP)
I'm looking for sources on information for finding properties and estimating settlements in Peats.  Are there typical compression indices used?  

RE: Peat Consolidation Characteristics

One correlation for compression index that I've seen and used is as follows:

Cc=1.15x(10^-2)xWn (Wn=native moisture content in decimal form)

My experience with consolidation tests indicate this correlation may be conservative in my area (Wisconsin).  In the book "Correlations of Soil Properties" by M Carter and S P Bentley (Pentech Press - London)it notes Cc can range from 10 to 15.

RE: Peat Consolidation Characteristics

I assisted a buddy of mine in running some tests on peats from Minnesota a couple of years ago for his graduate work.  We obtained peat samples (as undisturbed as possible) and ran consolidation tests along with SG, moisture, etc.  The peat was very moist and moderately fibrous, probably bordering on what some would call "muck."

Here are some of the results we had:

initial void ratio  7.5
initial moisture 619%
SG (solids)  1.24
Cv (1.5psi) 0.8in^2/sec (over stress increments tested)
Cc 4.5
Cr 0.16
C(alpha) 0.07 to 0.147 (secondary-tertiary)

other info for our site:
initial overburden 1.5psi
preconsolidation stress 6.2psi

Keep in mind that it is difficult to obtain good quality samples of peat.  We did the best we could, but the effects of the sampling certainly changed some of the insitu parameters.  We also monitored settlement of an earth embankment on the same site using settlement plates.  The actual settlement values of the new embankment were compared with the theoretical settlement estimate.  The two agreed fairly well given the factors involved and using judgement as to how the consolidation parameters were altered during sampling.  Hope this helps.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now
The Great Project Profitability Debate
A/E firms have a great opportunity to lead the world into the future, but the industry’s greatest asset—real-time data—is sitting wasted in clunky, archaic ERP platforms. Learn how real-time, fully interactive dashboards in a modern ERP allow you to unlock data that will shape the future of the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close