×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

multipliation rule for independent variables

multipliation rule for independent variables

multipliation rule for independent variables

(OP)
We have an issue with our customer concerning the stack-up of tolerances. Its similar to the common multipliation rule for independent variables for reliability calculations but this concerns the stack up of tolerances.
I am looking for a MIL-standard paragaph which calls out the proper way to stack tolerances.
For example, if a part has 4 independent tolerances on an initial value of X:
a 25%, b 40%, c 5%, d 35%
The worst-case value if all of these tolerances stack up in the negative direction would be:
X*(1-.25)*(1-.4)*(1-.05)*(1-.35) = 0.278 by the multipliation rule.
Our customer is insisting that we have to add these, not subtract. In the case above, he would calculate:
X* (1-25%-40%-5%-35%) = -0.05X He would conclude that an intial mass of X with this tolerance stack up could end up with a mass of -0.05X (which is preposterous).

The Question: Do know which paragraph in which MIL-handbook calls out to use the multipliation rule for tolerance stack up?

thanks  

RE: multipliation rule for independent variables

I'm a little new to the topic of reliability analysis, so I'm unsure of the answer myself.  Perhaps it's a terminology problem I'm having, because I don't know if you mean "uncertainty" or "variability" when you say "tolerance", and I don't know if they are each for separate components, or for different parameters of the same component, all of which influence its reliability.  In any event it sounds like you should go back to the original fault-tree analysis to determine the influence of these tolerances, instead of using them on their own.

For instance, if your article has a 0.0001 failure rate, and it can vary by 25% due to influence A, changing the failure rate to 0.000125 at worst or 0.000075 at best.  The other influence factors will have the same effect, leading to upper and lower bounds on the reliability with all factors considered.  The result you get would be STRONGLY dependent on the base failure rate of the component before the influence factors are applied.

(PS I think there is a 40-50% chance that I've misunderstood your question, haha).

I have found that the DOD 3235.1H primer on reliability to most helpful with my calculations.  Its full title is "Test and Evaluation of System Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability"
 printed in 1982.

 

STF

RE: multipliation rule for independent variables

I'm a little confused as well. Do you mean "tolerance" or "probability"?

Are you are refering to system reliability (X) with four different failure modes (a,b,c,d) and their probability values?

You may be in the wrong forum if your are asking about mass/weight and tolerances rather than Statistics..
 

RE: multipliation rule for independent variables

the basis of RSS is propagation of uncertainty: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty#Example

As you observe, adding tolerances results in not only absurd answers, but also gross over design.  If all the tolerances are truly independent, then the probability of each tolerance hitting its 3 sigma limit simultaneously is that probability raised to the number of components involved, so if the individual probability is 0.1%, and there are ten tolerances, the probability of all of them occurring simultaneously is 10^-30

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Chinese prisoner wins Nobel Peace Prize

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close