×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

microchip programming

microchip programming

microchip programming

(OP)
I'm working on a project where I'm programming an ARM microchip that acts as the "brains" on a custom board with other off-the-shelf components. In programming the ARM chip, you can program the other hardware components. Since I'm  not overly experienced as a programmer, and not very familiar with hardware development, I've got some questions. I've been told that due to the nature of my custom board and what its doing (some high-speed timing stuff), I should use some flavor of RTOS. Now I've also been told that RTOS is not necessary as I can program commands for my components right into the ARM c-code compiler. What's the more correct or better solution? And how does this all fit in with interrupts (and particularly software-interrupts).

RE: microchip programming

If this is a commercial project, you should rent an experienced programmer to help you figure out what to do and how to do it.

If it's a hobby project, do it both ways and learn.

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: microchip programming

(OP)
Allow me to clarify...

Does anyone have any thoughts, suggestions, comments, etc as to the use and effectiveness of an RTOS for microchip circuits for high-speed timing?

I was just trying to cast the proverbial "wider net" in regards to getting additional opinions and viewpoints.

:)

RE: microchip programming

If you elect to not use an RTOS, I suggest that you:
- study the documentation for an appropriate RTOS.
- write your code AS IF you are using an RTOS, i.e.,
- keep the application code separate from the core hardware interface code, and
- make the interface to your core code look pretty much like the RTOS.
That way, you can easily plug in the RTOS if you need it.

Also, at the lowest level, try to encapsulate the code associated with each chip or IP block, and give it an interface that's independent of which type of chip it is. ... so you can later substitute a different chip or IP block with minimal impact.

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: microchip programming

(OP)
Some good thoughts to chew on...thanks guys!
 

RE: microchip programming

If it's high-speed timing I'm mostly interested in, I'll stay far away from an RTOS.  An RTOS removes a level of control I want to retain.  If timing is not the only thing I need to worry about, then I have to weight the pros/cons of having the RTOS baggage around.

What type of project is this for?

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now
White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close