safiamoiz
The above replies reflected a lot of the regulatory issues surrounding making design changes to a safety-related pipe, especially in the US.
I believe on other threads you've indicated that you were in Asia (Pakistan??). Therefore the regulatory aspects may well be different. Additionally, there is nothing in your post that indicates that the pipe in question is in a nuclear safety-related system.
As racookpe1978 said, Schedule 80 pipe has a slightly smaller inside diameter. For your 4" pipe, it will go from 3.55" to 3.36" This will slightly increase your Reynolds number and your flow velocity. In addition, the pipe will weigh more (per my Crane 410, the weight difference is about 3 US pounds per foot of pipe -- or a total of 9 pounds more). You should evaluate the effects of these changes on your design, if the pipe is in a safety-related system.
However, my personal opinion is that, for a temporary change, it could be shown to be acceptable.
For everyone else, none of what I said above implies any sort of official NRC opinion.
Patricia Lougheed
******
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.