×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Factor of Safety

Factor of Safety

Factor of Safety

(OP)
Could someone clarify a comment given in a soils report about the factor of safety? A soils report gives cast-in-place pile a allowable bearing capacity is in undisturbed silt till of 360 kPa.  Later in the report it states that "normally a factor of safety of 3 should be allowed in calculations of safe loading value of end bearing piles and to ensure that settlements remain within the previously noted limits".

Do I take 3 x 360 = 1080 kPa and compared that against my factored loads (limit states design), or used unfactored load and compare it against 360 kPa?

Thank you in advance for your support!

RE: Factor of Safety

nicholi,
The word, "allowable" implies that the value given (360kPa) is what you can safely have at the end of the pile, i.e. it includes the factor of safety already.  The next comment in the report does contradict it though.  It would be a good idea to call the geotechnical engineer and ask which it is.  Normally, when we give recommendations in our geotech reports, we include the factor of safety in the pressure or value where applicable so that the client doesn't need to decide what the appropriate factor of safety is.  The geotech engineer would probably be more than happy to clear that up for you.
Mark  

RE: Factor of Safety

I agree with MRM, you should talk to the geotechnical engineer who wrote the report.  When I see the word "capacity", I think of only strength considerations, not settlement.  If the report later discusses a net allowable bearing "pressure" then I would assume settlement has also been considered.  Sometimes the allowable bearing "capacity" is further reduced to keep settlement within tolerable limits.  In my opinion a good report should tell you what value you should use (considering both strength and settlement issues), and just note what factor of safety was considered in the recommended value.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now
The Great Project Profitability Debate
A/E firms have a great opportunity to lead the world into the future, but the industry’s greatest asset—real-time data—is sitting wasted in clunky, archaic ERP platforms. Learn how real-time, fully interactive dashboards in a modern ERP allow you to unlock data that will shape the future of the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close