Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


CAESAR Load Case Trouble...

CAESAR Load Case Trouble...

CAESAR Load Case Trouble...

I posted this on the COADE site as well, but it's not even being read... not much traffic there right now I guess.
Strange things going on with Springs...

I have a model with Weight Temperature Displacement + Wind. Plus Spring Hangers.

No Pressure... actually slightly negative pressure but CAESAR doesn't seem to take negative pressure anymore. I could swear I had done some long ago with negative pressure. Anyway, I left Pressure out of the Load Cases (at first), then went back and included 0.01psi for Pressure. Not that it changed anything.

In the results (Operating Case) one spring is allowing ~2½" drop when I would prefer only ~¼" drop. So I made that spring a User Defined with 10,640 #/in (it's actually 2 springs) and installed load 28,000#. That gave the large negative displacement. So, I upped the cold load to 30,000... same negative displacement. I eventually doubled the cold load to 60,000# and it still drops ~ 2½".

Then it started giving me messages like:
"Hanger Loads exist in the model but were not included in the hanger restrained weight run"
followed by:
"Hanger Loads exist in the job but were not included in the hanger operating load case"
whereupon it lets me into the Load Case Editor.

What is wrong with this line up of cases:

L1: W                  HGR           Rigid
L2: W+D1+T1+P1         HGR           Ignore
L3: W+D1+T1+P1+H       OPE           As Designed
L4: W+P1+H             SUS As Designed
L5: W+D1+T1+P1+H+WIN1  OPE As Designed
L6: W+D1+T1+P1+H+WIN2  OPE As Designed
L7: W+D1+T1+P1+H+WIN3  OPE As Designed
L8: W+D1+T1+P1+H+WIN4  OPE As Designed
L9: L3-L4 EXP  (Algebraic)
L10: L5-L3 OCC (Algebraic)
L11: L6-L3 OCC (Algebraic)
L12: L7-L3 OCC (Algebraic)
L13: L8-L3 OCC (Algebraic)
L14: L4+L10 OCC (Scalar)
L15: L4+L11 OCC (Scalar)
L16: L4+L12 OCC (Scalar)
L17: L4+L13 OCC (Scalar)

Wind Loads are done as I always do them... one each from N,S,E,W ASCE#7

I've used this load case setup many times, but not with Displacements (D1)... have I missed something somewhere?

I hope I'm overlooking something obvious.

RE: CAESAR Load Case Trouble...

Loren at COADE/Intergraph set me back on the straight & narrow.  
I forgot to go back and add the hanger loads (H) in the 2 HGR cases after changing one to a User Defined Hanger.

As usual, the longer it takes to figure out a computer problem, the more obvious the solution. :p

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close