×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

the unit after taking FFT transform

the unit after taking FFT transform

the unit after taking FFT transform

(OP)
what is the unit of the data after taking FFT transform?
say, if we have a group of acceleration data, usually the acceleration is in m/s^2 or g, what is the unit after the FFT transform and take the magnitude?

many people just say it is Frequency Response Function(FRF) and label Magnitude for the Y x-axis, what really is it?

Thanks

RE: the unit after taking FFT transform

The FFT is an algorithm, or digital calculation routine, that efficiently calculates the discrete Fourier transform from the sampled time waveform. In other words it converts, or "transforms" a signal from the time domain into the frequency domain. It is not in itself a unit of measure. The amplitudes of the individual frequencies generated in the FFT may be expressed in any engineering unit.

A spectrum display is a plot where the X axis represents vibration frequency and the Y axis represents amplitude. If the data is taken in acceleration, the Y axis may be displayed in acceleration or integrated to velocity or double integrated to displacement.

RE: the unit after taking FFT transform

I agree with dg.  If you are measuring acceleration, then typically the spectrum will be labeled with g's.

But....

I do think that under some circumstances it is reasonable to consider the units of the continous fourier transform (and by extension the FFT spectral components) to be g-sec.

Consider Parseval's relation:
Integral(x^2(t)dt)=Integral(X^2(w)dw)
where x(t) is time and X(w) is frequency domain.
The left side will have units of g^2*sec
The right side if we treat X as g's would have units of g^2/sec.

But if we treat X as g-sec, the right side will be (g-sec)^2/sec = g^2*sec.

The discrete fourier transform has a summed Parseval's equation which does not create the same motivation for g-sec. But if we are interpretting our FFT as representative of a continuous spectrum... g-sec might be reasonable. Am I off base here?

RE: the unit after taking FFT transform

It depends on your FFT algorithm. Some normalise w.r.t the number of points in the transform window - some don't. The best way to check is to systhesise a signal,

say 1*sin(2*pi*t) + 2*cos(6*pi*t)

for a number of points such that the signal is periodic, say 32 points at a time interval of 3-(3/32) seconds for the above example, and run it through the FFT algorithm. This allows you to check both the scaling of the FFT algorithm and the ordering of the positive, negative, nyquist and dc spectral lines.

M

RE: the unit after taking FFT transform

That's a good trick that can save hours of hair pulling.

All our FFTs have units up the side, they wouldn't be much use for engineering if they didn't.

The actual units of the sine and cosine functions in a hand calculated fourier analysis are the same as the original units of measure... so I'm inclined to think that they are in g, in this case (obviously so for tonal components if you think about it).

Since 75% of my career has been based on assuming that an FFT is a reasonable approximation to a proper fourier series, I'm going to stic with that!




Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: the unit after taking FFT transform

I don't have a firm argument one way or the other.

Mikey - if I understand you correctly the N will carry with it some units of time?  I suspect you're right but I can't connect the dots. Can you explain a little more how that would come about?

Greg - If you assume the FFT is the same as Fourier series (special case of Fourier transform).... then  what about the continuous Parseval's equation? It won't hold if you assume X(w) and x(t) have the same units.

RE: the unit after taking FFT transform

I carefully skirted Parseval because I hadn't seen it before.

However, on rereading it, what it seems to be saying is that the energy of the spectrum is the same as the energy of the time history, which is a damn good place to start.

I agree with your reasoning, but I don't like it very much!

On further examination, you are definitely calculating a Real energy in the time domain, but is integral(((X(w))^2)dw) always Real? I don't think so, always, for instance if X(w)=j then you would get a very silly result, but the Iin the time domain it is a sensible if strange waveform.

Puxxled? I am.Puzzled as well.









Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: the unit after taking FFT transform

Greg - I should have used magnitude symbols |x^2| and |X^2| (that's what I get for going from memory).  I think resolves the real/complex puzzle.  (sorry for my error).

RE: the unit after taking FFT transform

If I look at definition of continuous fourier transform, I again come up with the conclusion that X(w) has units of x(t) multiplied by time

I think MikeyP was onto something.  IF I consider the sample frequency to be constant, then multiplying by N has the same proportional effect for discrete transforms as multiplying by T has for continuous transforms.  That multiplication (or division...I've lost track) might remove the time units.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - PLM and ERP: Their Respective Roles in Modern Manufacturing
Leading manufacturers are aligning their people, processes, and tools from initial product ideation through to field service. They do so by providing access to product and enterprise data in the context of each person’s domain expertise. However, it can be complicated and costly to unite engineering with the factory and supply chain. Download Now
White Paper - Medical Device Design Control
Medical device product development is a highly integrated and regulated process. Implementation of a requirements tracking solution requires attention to a variety of nuanced topics. When presented with the task of tracking the many concept relationships in a project of this type, the initial software solution of choice tends to be a two-dimensional text systems. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close