×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

RISA Common Errors...

RISA Common Errors...

RISA Common Errors...

(OP)
I've got a RISA 3d model built up.  Used plates, its a pretty simple little support I probably missing something simple.

All the forces are in the X direction, vertical axis is the Z axis.

I have what is basically a column sitting on a plate with 4 pin nodes.  I was expecting to see equal (or very close to) equal forces at the nodes in each direction...yet I'm seeing reactions in the X, Y and Z direction.

I did not expect to see any forces in the Y direction...I'm a bit baffled as to why they are there.  I did have to connect a pipe to the plates on top of the support so I used 4 rigid sections.  Looks like there is torsion in the rigid sections...maybe thats translating through the plates...if thats whats going on I could use a tip on how to connect these elements so it doesn't happen.

I uploaded the file to engineering.com haven't done this before so hopefully it works...was expecting a link or something to appear.

RE: RISA Common Errors...

I think your vertical column sides (veeerrrry long finite elements) aren't the best modeling technique.  

Usually try to limit your aspect ratio of your elemenent to 1.5:1 or prefereably as close to 1:1 as possible.

also - display your plate surface loads - you have a weird side panel surface load that doesn't look right.
 

RE: RISA Common Errors...

Well, the net reaction in the Y direction should certainly be zero.  But, I wouldn't necessarily expect every joint to have a zero Y reaction.  

Now, looking at that model, there are problems with the way you've defined your plate elements. The length of some of your plates is 5 in x 163 inches. That's an aspect ratio of more than 30 to 1. That's probably going to do some funny things to the plate element formulation.  

To be safe, this aspect ratio should not exceed a value of 9.0.  And, personally, I like to keep it close to 3.0 or so.   

Also, some of your most critical plates are Tri's.  The triangular element forumultion is not as accurate as the quad. It's really just a collapsed quad and can be viewed as a highly distorted quad element.  Therefore, I'd suggest using the submesh tri's tool to convert those into quadrilateral elements.  Then mesh the rest of the plates 2x2 to match up with the new mesh.  

At that point, you should have a better model.  You'll still get some Y reactions.  But, at least you'll be able to trust the rest of your model behavior.   

RE: RISA Common Errors...

(OP)
Thanks Josh and JAE.

Actually, now that I think about it thats kind of funny...finite element analysis by using large elements!  It does seem a little incompatable.

I made the changes, an updated model is attached.

X and Z reactions I get since there are forces and moments applied that would elicit that reaction...Y does seem to pretty much cancel out now.  

Is the force in the Y direction due to deformation of the base plate?  I guess that would make sense and normally when I do hand calcs I don't check that...

RE: RISA Common Errors...

The short answer is that, yes, the Y reaction at each node is due to deformation of the plate.  Or, the two way shear resistance of the plate.  

The bigger concern to me would be the fact that the SUM of the Y reactions is not equal to zero.  Let's see if we can justify that.  

I suspect that (for this model), the rigid links are behaving a bit too rigidly and you are getting some "ghost reactions".  Ghost reactions occur when the internal stiffness of a member begins to approach or exceed the stiffness that we use for boundary conditions.

The program is usually smart enough to throw up a warning message when this happens.  But, in this case, the magnitude of the load is so small (0.1 lbs compared to an applied load of 1000 lbs or so) that it is not detecting the lost load.  

To solve this problem, we can change the E, I, A and J values of the rigid links to 1E5 rather than 1E6 or 1E8 which they currently are set to.  This seems to eliminate the problem.  Does it also reduce the Y reactions at individual joints?  If it does, it's not by much.  

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close