Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Bearing Pads

Bearing Pads

Bearing Pads

I have a condition where I have a heavily loaded concrete retaining/basement wall which bears against the vertical surface of a concrete beam/slab. I want to place a bearing pad along the length of the wall (about 60'). The applied service load is 8.2K/Ft. It has been a long time since I sized a pad for this condition.

Will a 3/8" thick x 8" wide x continuous fiber reinforced neoprene bearing pad with a hardness of 80 work or is it an overkill?

RE: Bearing Pads

You might want to consider a smaller, thicker, softer, unreinforced pad.  The pad you describe will be very hard. It will not deform and spread the load evenly.

RE: Bearing Pads

I agree w/ graybeach. A plain elastomeric pad (neoprene or natural rubber) similar to what we use for bearing pads for bridge girders should work well. We typically use 50 hardness elastomer at 1/2" thick, which would carry the 8.2 k/ft easily at 8" wide and would conform to the surface much better than a reinforced pad.

The LRFD Bridge Design specs give a service load compression limit of 0.8 ksi for PEP and FGP, so to answer your question - yes, 3/8" x 8" FGP would be major overkill for that loading.

RE: Bearing Pads

I have always used manufacturers' specifications when it comes to allowable working loads for bearing pads. The supplier should also have some test certificates to support their specifications.

If we are comparing this application to that of a bridge girder, do you need to consider replacement of the bearing pad after a certain amount of time (say 50 years)?

RE: Bearing Pads

You are correct about using the working loads from the manufacturer, kikflip. I gave those numbers for perspective only, to show that the plain elastomeric pads are generally more than adequate for the proposed loading.

As to replacement, we only consider fatigue for the steel shims in steel reinforced bearings. A PEP should not have a fatigue problem, and there are not any degradation problems that I am aware of from prolonged exposure to concrete, steel or sunlight. If there are other environmental concerns at the site, those should be addressed with the manufacturer.

RE: Bearing Pads

Thanks for the input.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close