Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

How to detect discontinuous permafrost

How to detect discontinuous permafrost

How to detect discontinuous permafrost

Is there a state of the art technique on how to detect the presence of ice, ice chunks, ice lenses which grow under the ground , particularly in the discontinuous permafrost region ?

I am looking for technique or equipment which can "sweep" the ground and provide reliable results of "x-ray" view of the ground with locations of ice lenses, thickness and depths. Is GPR (ground penetrating radar) , or electrical resistivity can map this ? Will air photo using infra red film can detect this ?


RE: How to detect discontinuous permafrost

Yes, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and resistivity can map permafrost, but so can other surface electromagnetic (EM) methods. GPR and surface EM are more rapid methods than surface resistivity, and thus, are usually less costly to implement. However, the key questions to answer before using any method are:

1. What is the host soil material? If it has a high concentration of clay, GPR may not be of use because of the attentuation of radar signals in clay soils. Likewise, if there is not a significant contrast in electrical properties between the ice and surrounding soil, then electrical/EM methods may not be your best choice.

2. What is the approximate depth and extent of the permafrost your trying to identify? This will aid in designing the survey.

3. How accessible is the surface? Are there any surface features or cultural 'noise' sources that may interfere with the measurements and that may inhibit detection/imaging of the permafrost layers?

Aerial methods to image permafrost may work, but will only be able to identify large-scale changes in their extent.

Hope this helps.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close