Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


17-4 ph cond h900

17-4 ph cond h900

17-4 ph cond h900

I work with stainless steel 17-4 ph cond A and I have to bring it to cond h900. How do I know how long I have to heat up the pieces to get good result? And will I have a different result heating up too long.  

RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

Condition H900 is one hour @ 900F plus/minus 15F.
This means the metal temperature is at 900F when the clock starts. You can put the part into an oven that is at 900F from room temperature to minimize the metal heat up time. If your oven has circulation I would allow 15 min per in thickness to come up to temperature. If there is no circulation I would allow 25 minutes per inch of thickness if the oven is at 900F. I would not exceed 15 minutes on the clock.

Can you comeback with the size of your part with the thickness section?

If possible the end use as there are some caveats on using 17-4 PH H900.


RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

In addition to what was mentioned by unclesyd regarding time at temperature, now is as good of time as any to mention that furnace temperature surveys are important as is monitoring time at temperature.

I can't tell you how many times during audits I have requested the latest temperature survey of a heat treatment furnace and I receive a blank stare.

RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

My problem is that I did heat up a little bit longer(2hours)a piece of 1.75" thick, hardness test gave me 38Hrc and hardness is not the same all around the piece.
  Do you think that the fact I heated up to long could be the problem, or could my cooling process be part of the result?...
   I cool up by opening about 2" wide the door of the oven en leaving piece in the oven.

  End use of the the piece is a 20Tons tention Load cell to go on a crane. The crane is located off shore.   

RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

I would not use this piece any where near a crane.
Your part will need to solution heat treated and re heat treated using the correct temperature, time, and cooling rate.

Before we go any further exactly how is the 17/4 part going to be used, like is it in tension or compression?  

I personally would not use 17/4 @ H900 on any part of a lifting device especially offshore due to it's lower ductility and a higher degree of susceptibility to Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking.    

RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

The piece will be use in tension. Most Load cells from specialized manifacturer are made of 17-4, final condition can go from H900 to H1100 and H1150+1150... This depend on safety factors that has to be respected.
  Load cells consist in measuring the deflection of the metal. Ductility has to be low to get good result. I know about the higher degree of susceptibility to Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking, but how exactly can I control it?
  What would be the stainless type you would use for such application.   

RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

Heat treatment depend on safety factors, but also on how big of a deflection they will need to get a good reading.

RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

I would look at Nitronic 50(High Strength).  You might give HPA a call with your requirements.

The ductility of of Nitronic 50 (HS) is reduced based on the amount of cold work introduced in the metal.   It also has better resistance to SCC than 17/4 SS


RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

I have seen 17-4 used for load cells, with a 20-1 (or greater) safety factor.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: 17-4 ph cond h900


Around saltwater in condition H900 ?

RE: 17-4 ph cond h900

I am sure that the ones that I worked with were aged at a higher temp.  I didn't check the mechanicals but I seem to recall 1050F.
They were fully painted, either epoxy or powder coated.
And the safety factors were huge.  We had one rated for 25T, it would take 100T without damage to calibration, and at 100T it still had a more than 4:1 factor.  The material was never stressed to over 10% of the minimum yield strength.  

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close