Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Ferrule Crimp Development

Ferrule Crimp Development

Ferrule Crimp Development

Good morning gentlemen,

We are trying to develop a manufacturing process to attach a round stainless ferrule onto a 7 strand braided cable in an assembly. The hex dies that worked previously in prototypes are now currently causing failures. We are sort of at a loss to explain why we are suddenly getting so much variation and I was hoping somebody with experience in this sort of thing could maybe give us some ideas on how to solve it.

When destructive testing samples, we either get parts slipping at 20 lbs or going all the way up until the cable breaks at ~60. There is no variation in between, simply on and off. What could cause this? There is no visual difference between the two.


Using arbor toggle press to generate load, dies are pressed closed(so any additional force shouldn't affect crimp) We did some instron testing to find out load that dies will be closed at when compressing the parts.

Small parts, ferrule is .050 is OD, .024 ID. wire is 7 strand braided sst cable with wires about .008 diameter.

There is a lot of discussion about changing the die geometry to make it smaller but my heartburn about that is that it seems to me there is some type of uncommon cause of variation that is leading to these results.

Not being too familiar with these sorts of processes my hope is someone on here can point us in the right direction.


RE: Ferrule Crimp Development

In any process which is showing variability all factors must be addressed until the process is repeatable. Examples are:

Is the press completing the cycle in the same closed location?
Is the die closing to the same size/location?
Is the part being presented in the same position and orientation?
Is the cable size changing?
Is the ferule consistent?

You will have to review the process and eliminate the variablity if possible. If the problem is the cable size if variable you may need to go to a supplier with a more consistent cable.

Good Luck,

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close