×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

(OP)
Hello,

I have a question regarding the best way to dimension and tolerance close fitting, mating parts.

I have two parts made from 60-61-T6 aluminum that mate with a tongue and groove fit. I have a 0.250" wide tongue that must fit into a 0.250" wide groove. There cannot be any interference between the tongue and groove, but the parts should fit together with the least amount of clearance possible at the width.

Periodically, the part with the groove will slide on the part with the tongue very slowly, but the sliding is so intermittent and slow that friction and wear is not an issue.

I think the maximum amount of clearance I could get away with between the parts would be about .004" & I would feel more comfortable with .002".

1.which of the following dimension / tolerances would be best to keep clearance to a minimum (or are both the same)? They both have the same amount of total clearance possible, but from a machining standpoint, would one produce better overall results for the majority of parts?

A. Groove 0.250" wide +/- 0.001"
   Tongue 0.249" wide + 0.000" -0.002"
   Worst case = 0.004" clearance

B. Groove 0.250" wide + 0.002" -0.000"
   Tongue 0.250" wide + 0.000" -0.002"
   Worst case = 0.004" clearance

2. Are there any general guidelines when dimensioning and tolerancing mating parts like this? I want to eliminate as much clearance as possible and still keep costs reasonable. At what point would tolerances begin to really become a cost issue?

3.Provided the total variance in tolerance is the same, in general, is there any difference in machining cost between bilateral or unilateral tolerancing? For example, (plus or minus 0.001") versus (plus 0.000 minus .002").

Thanks for your help. I would appreciate any feedback.

John
       


RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

You need to use some GD&T on this - max and min material conditions with Profile should narrow it down.
It also depends on mfg process - extruded or machined.
Keep in mind that temperature plays a role, so you might want to spec the inspection temperature and check your clearances at operating temps.
enjoy

Keep the wheels on the ground
Bob
showshine@aol.com

RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

The ISO system of fits (metric) is the tool for situations like this. You can try it - convert your dimensions in mm, find appropriate internal/external part combination of fits (like 12.7H7/f6), check for the numerical values and convert it back in inches (if necessary). The ISO fits and the charts with their numerical values are also in Machinery's handbook.
gearguru

RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

Part of you question asks do you use .250 +/- .001 or .250 +.002/-.000.  The answer to that is in your tooling.  if you have a cutter for the slot that is .250 then you would use .250 +/-.001.  This allows for over size cutting in the slot and wear on the tool.  If you cutter is .251 then you use .250 +.002/-.000 same as above.  Your toleance is the same.  Your Base dimension is a function of the cutting tool.

Lynn

RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

I agree that your groove width is a function of your cutting tool. I recommend that you go with a +.002/-.000 slot width. Milling cutters and end mills tend to cut over their nominal size due to runout. Furthermore, according to the Machinery's Handbook, standard keyway tolerances are +.002/-.000 and +.000/-.002 for the key. I think this application is similar to cutting keyways.

RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

Depending on the length of the part, they can even be Wire EDM'ed with +/-.0005" or even closer. Even Machining to that tolerance might be possible.
If you need further help, please let me know.

RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

For the groove I would follow the advice of jjjaos. About the tongue you may permit tolerancing up to 0/-0.001" because easier manufafacturing and measuring. In this way you will accept the advice of gearguru, because the ISO system of fits offers fit like this.
Good luck!

RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

I agree with the advice of jjjaos, but with one exception.  You need to consider the length of your parts.  If your mill bed can handle a 3 foot part, great, but if more than one set-up is required, I would add a little more to the "fit".  Talk to your machinist.  He/she will give you a better idea of what the mill can do.  Some mills aren't refurbished properly.

RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

All of the information given here is good but if you want the best possible fit, then you need to make a change in the design and add an adjustable gib to the groove. This will allow a true sliding fit with no side to side play.
Otherwise follow GD&T guidelines for fits and dimensional tolerance stack-up.

Woody Ebersold
Consulting Engineer
"AN EXPERT IS ALWAYS SOMEONE FROM OUT OF TOWN"

RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

(OP)
Hello,

I just wanted to thank everyone for their replies to this post. I have received some interesting feedback, & I like hearing all the different points of view. Someone had pointed out that the length of the parts is a factor. I forgot to mention the length (1.375") in my original post.

At the website www.engineersedge.com under the DFM section, it states that bilateral tolerances should be used with CNC due to "cutter compensation". However, I am not sure if this would apply to my situation. I have pasted the link below if anyone wants to take a look.

Thanks again.

John

http://www.engineersedge.com/design_guidelines.htm


RE: Dimensioning and tolerancing close fitting mating parts

Hi . I advice you to use the Iso tolorancing tables to find out it , but I should tell you that the correct answer for each case is found by try and error .if you have the chance of it .because many many items infect the tolorancing ,such as heat transfer ,vibration, material,machining quality , so you should consider all of this .Although there are many standardised tables for different items , for exmple bearings,pullys,gears,o-rings and also some examples for different clearanses but if you case is a uniqe one you should find it out yourself by trying different standard tolorances from ISO tables considering other parameters like manufacturing , cost and ...

Good luck
Alan Minasian

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now