DnV RP F103 vs. DnV RP B401: Coating Breakdown factor
DnV RP F103 vs. DnV RP B401: Coating Breakdown factor
(OP)
the coating breakdown coefficients (a and b) in DnV-RP-B401 where in order of 0.1 and 0.01.
these coefficient are remained unchanged in new revision of B401.
on the other hand, the DnV-RP-F103 proposes very different coefficients, which are in order of 0.001 and 0.0001; which leads to very light anodes.
What is the problem? It doesn't seem to be correct and I smell a rat in this approach???
these coefficient are remained unchanged in new revision of B401.
on the other hand, the DnV-RP-F103 proposes very different coefficients, which are in order of 0.001 and 0.0001; which leads to very light anodes.
What is the problem? It doesn't seem to be correct and I smell a rat in this approach???
RE: DnV RP F103 vs. DnV RP B401: Coating Breakdown factor
Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04
RE: DnV RP F103 vs. DnV RP B401: Coating Breakdown factor
does the large difference between breakdown factors is related to improvements in Coating quality?
I found a document from Norway Oil Authority mentioned that this is the result of higher quality coatings, but the F103 just refers to F106 & F102 for coating spec.
What I am exactly worry about is to use F103 in my project, while the coating will not be as advanced as supposed to be.
In the other word, how could I add some conservatism in to my design? (there are some options in F103 for that, which one is reasonable?)
Pipeliner Dude
Offshore Pipeline Engineer
RE: DnV RP F103 vs. DnV RP B401: Coating Breakdown factor
Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04
RE: DnV RP F103 vs. DnV RP B401: Coating Breakdown factor
It seems that's the best option.
Pipeliner Dude
Offshore Pipeline Engineer