Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

How to justify timber grade 50 years ago

How to justify timber grade 50 years ago

How to justify timber grade 50 years ago

This time, I tried to attach a fireplace hood (400 lbs) to the existing wood joist.  Using DF #2, I noticed the wood joist could not even hold its own existing loads.  But the contractor argued  that nobody use DF #2 50 years ago and the joist without any knots should be classified as DF #1 and better.  

My question are how to justify the lumber grade 50 years ago and what kind of equivalent values we can use for today's calculations.  I like to hear your thoughts.

RE: How to justify timber grade 50 years ago

Grading rules have changed a bit over the years, but your contractor might be correct. Further, it is possible you have a full size rather than nominal size joist (2x12 was actually 2"x12").

Find the prevailing grading agency for your area and see if you can get some historical data.  The National Forest Products Association might be of some assistance.

The joist is obviously performing if you don't notice excessive deflection or creep, making it stronger than your calculation imply.

RE: How to justify timber grade 50 years ago

If the joist still has sawmarks on it, it may be full size. I don't know Ron's age, but 50 years ago, in Canada, a 2x12 was 1-5/8x11-5/8 and the lumber was seasoned (shrinkage was minimal). Typical Doug Fir was either #1 or Select and the flexural strength for #1 was 1500f and shear was 120 psi, if memory serves. These values were based on service loasds, not factored loads.

RE: How to justify timber grade 50 years ago

dik...I'm a little older than the project!  In the US at that time, we had nominal sizing as you've noted for Canada; however, there were still many locally produced lumber items that were rough cut and sized.

RE: How to justify timber grade 50 years ago

There have been many posts on this subject, I suggest you google it at the top of the page.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close