×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

(OP)
In numerous geotechnical reports that address the lateral capacity of relatively short (5-15 ft) drilled piers I have seen a statement indicating that lateral resistance can be calculated by assuming the passive earth pressure acts against the projected area of the pier times 1.5.  Can anyone shed some light on the physics behind this?  I can't find any literature that indicates this is acceptable.  I don't understand why a cylindrical pier should have some increased lateral capacity over a non-cylindrical pier or pile.

RE: Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

Terzaghi,

If the lateral force is applied at or near the top of the drilled pier, the pier is subject to a bending moment and the soil restraint can NOT be calculated as simple as the projected area times the soil passive pressure.    For this case you could use the Broms' Method or one of the computer programs for laterally loaded piles.

If the lateral force is applied at the same depth as the soil passive pressure resultant, as it is the case for deadmen or anchors, then the soil restraint is a function of the passive pressure, the projected area of the deadman, and a coefficient larger than 1.   This coefficient varies with the spacing and depth of the deadman, and included the additional shear resistance of the soil on each side of the deadman.   Many books instead of a coefficient give the equivalent values of Kp.   Remember to include a safety factor, since passive pressure is an ultimate capacity.
You could find information on deadman design in very old foundations books, per example "Steel Sheet Piling Design Manual", a publication of United States Steel.  "Foundation Analysis and Design", by Bowles also discusses the subject.


Hope this will answer your question.



RE: Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

(OP)
Thanks for the response.  I agree with what you are saying, however, I am just trying to find out where this 1.5 times the area of the pier comes from.  The senior engineers at my firm are kind of old school.  They just say they learned from their mentors that this is the case.  I have also read a quite a few geotechnical reports that indicates this "magical factor" may be applied.  I just can't find any justification for it and the senior engineers at my office are content in their inability to explain why this is the case.

Perhaps this is just some kind of "geotechnical urban legend" in my part of the country.

RE: Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

Brom's method for lateral load on a pile assumes that the effective passive area is three times the face width. At some point someone probably started using 1.5 to have a factor of safety of 2 on the passive pressure coefficient. This method works well on  a braced soldier pile wall, but be careful on a catilevered pile, as the stress distribution along the pile is somewhat more complicated.

RE: Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

Check out paper by Golder and Seychuk in Pan Am Geotechnical conference - I think it was 1964 or so.  They have provided background to soldier piles for braced excavation of the Toronto subway.  Sorry, I am overseas and don't have exact details of paper.

Best regards to all.

RE: Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

Terzaghi:
The physics behind this is the shear developed as the pile shaft moves latterally under the load, both bearing against the soil in front and shearing the soil on parts of the sides.
The factor 1.5 is not universal - for small diameter piles it could be as high as 2 (dia below 450mm), and for piles above 1200mm some authors are recommending 1.25 (J Bowles - Foundation Analysis and Design).

RE: Applicability of 1.5 times area of pier for lateral loads

Terzaghi -

You are right to be skeptical - it's only a rule-of-thumb/order-of-magnitude estimate to check calculations from more precise techniques.  I think it is based on a paper by Brinch Hansen (1964?) that has an unrealistic passive pressure distribution on the pile.  Rather, an unrealistic and dangerous pressure distribution.

Broms techniques are fairly simple, fast and pretty good (I checked them out against COM624 (LPILE's predecessor computer code) in the 1980's.  While it is perfectly reasonable and prudent to use a rough estimation technique to review the results of more sophisticated analyses, there's no excuse for using these kinds of rules-of-thumb for final design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close