Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Radiation unit converstion

Radiation unit converstion

Radiation unit converstion

What is 1x10^5Gy/40year in rads?


RE: Radiation unit converstion

Another question,

I am designing an ETFE seat for a ball valve but I don't know if the ETFE can handle radiation level of 1x10^5Gy/40year. I have a document saying that ETFE can handle 1x10^8 rads but how is it related to 1x10^5Gy/40year?

Many thanks,

RE: Radiation unit converstion

The radiation absorbed dose is measured in Gray, rad, rem and Sievert (Sv).
1 rad = 1000 mrad = 10 mGy = 0.01 Gy

so 1X10^5Gy/40year would be a rate  

RE: Radiation unit converstion

try http://www.unitconversion.org/radiation-absorbed-dose/gray-to-rads-conversion.html

although technically byrdj is correct - dose per unit time is rate - i think that the 40 year timespan is coming from what a concept similar to committed dose i.e. dose accrued over a life-span.

i'm presuming that the radiation you're talking about is either a gamma or neutron field - 10^5 grays would be 10^7 rads so you could view your 10^8 rads figure in two ways 1)the total dose which exceeds your 10^5 grays over 40 years by a factor of 10. 2) you would need to find out if the 10^8 grays is total or based on some unit of time to make sure you weren't exceeding a dose rate.

regards HM

No more things should be presumed to exist than are absolutely necessary - William of Occam

RE: Radiation unit converstion

Radiation effects over time cannot be "assumed" very well: the difference between (very high) energy gamma, (medium energy) gamma, X-ray, thermal and high-energy neutrons, and simple heat stress over time gets very complicated:  Different material react differently to each kind of different radiation damage.

Don't relate "biological equivalent radiation units" to simple metallic damage either: equal (or convertible) biological doses will still have physically different effects in different materials, and a material defect that a cell can "regrow" or "replace" will never go away in a crystal or plastic part.   

If you can't duplicate your requirement in the literature, Run a simple test (at SWRI or someplace equal research institute) of "what radiation" at "what energy" at "what rate" hitting "what material" at "what temperature"?   

Don't assume conditions: Higher temperatures might "repair" interstitial impact damage, or might make it worse.  Higher energies will likely make damage worse, but higher energies might be between resonance points and be less damaging.    

RE: Radiation unit converstion

racookpe1978 what is SWRI?

Ultimately i wouldn't expect someone to design a seal (or anything for that matter) for 40 years with no maintenance regime.

Kind regards, HM

No more things should be presumed to exist than are absolutely necessary - William of Occam

RE: Radiation unit converstion

Southwest Research Institute - a private (fee-based) facility in San Antonio TX that does long-term fatigue and stress failure (vibration-induced) analysis, along with lots of other areas of practical materials research.    

They're nuclear-licensed - so they can handle and be environmentally safe checking out and disposing of radiation-enhanced test materials, and have tested some nuclear-grade materials and welds for some of the power projects I've worked in the past.   Also aerodynamic and metals testing.

Regrettably, that same license familiarity and proven ability also increases fees.   8<(.

RE: Radiation unit converstion

hey cool, just looked at their website - am going to delve a little bit!!

unfortunately add the word nuclear to anything and cost seems to spiral...bit like the word wedding smile

Cheers, HM

No more things should be presumed to exist than are absolutely necessary - William of Occam

RE: Radiation unit converstion


Looking for radiation effects on valve seats,PTFE,UHMWPE,PEEK,etc

Also materials such as 316 stainless and alloys etc

Anybody got any info or stites etc



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close