×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

(OP)
Hello everyone!
This is my first post.

My question is very simple:

Where can I modify the maximum bounding limits for the NX?
For example, if I try to make a equilateral triangle with a 300000mm lateral and use those vertex points to create a 3 points general conic, I have the following error "Invalid conic".
Another example is trying to make a face extrusion or any other feature to a simple cube of 300000mm lateral dimension.
Please, who can help me to solve this problem?
Thank you all and my regards!
 

RE: NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

OK, the 'size' of the model space of NX is FIXED and can NOT be altered by the user.  The simplest description is that it's a...

Cube with its centroid located at 0,0,0 (absolute X,Y,Z), with each of its 3 sides measuring 1,000 units in length.

All NX part files, irrespective of the units-of-measure which you are working in, be it Inches for an Imperial Part file or Millimeters for a Metric Part file, the working 'model space' is defined using the METER as the base 'unit'.  Therefore ALL POINTS on a model must lie somewhere between -500M X,Y,Z and +500M X,Y,Z in order for the system to assure that the results of any creation operation will be a valid model or that assumptions depending on planarity, alignment, coincidences, etc. are properly met.

I hope that this clarifies the issue and provides you with enough information so that you can construct your models in a manner where the spatial limitations of the NX working model will not become an issue.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

(OP)
Thank you very much for your reply JohnRBaker!

However, regarding the maximum of 1000meters X,Y,Z, in my example, I can't do anything bigger than something lying in the +300meters X,Y,Z and -300meters X,Y,Z...  :(

So, regarding the limitation of 1000meters, how can I make a structural analysis of big structures like a 2000meters bridge?

Waiting for another helpful feedback, thank you all!

RE: NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

(OP)
I heard from another NX expert that the maximum working plane is 36Km!

But, how can it be if I can't make anything away from a +300meters X,Y,Z and -300meters X,Y,Z ?

If someone tries to make an extrusion from a face of a cube with 600meters of width, it not possible!

Please, can anyone help me?

Cheers...

RE: NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

(OP)
Please, can anyone help me?

RE: NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

We've explained what the limitations are.  Nothing has changed since then and there is no expectation that anything will be changing in the near future.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

What John has said is correct, this is not a user editable function - The working area that NX lives inside is generous enough for the majority of users.

All I can suggest is that you model to quarter scale so that your model does not hit the outside of the working envelope.

Maybe NX isn't the place to be modelling a bridge to double precision? To the best of my knowledge NX rarely gets used for architectural design as it is far too precise – Aeroplanes, Oil Tankers – yes, Skyscrapers, Bridges – No..  

 

RE: NX System Defined Maximum 3D Model Space

Well, maybe not 'Oil Tankers', but certainly Submarines and Aircraft Carriers.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - PLM and ERP: Their Respective Roles in Modern Manufacturing
Leading manufacturers are aligning their people, processes, and tools from initial product ideation through to field service. They do so by providing access to product and enterprise data in the context of each person’s domain expertise. However, it can be complicated and costly to unite engineering with the factory and supply chain. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close