×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Simple Apparatus AS 60079.11

Simple Apparatus AS 60079.11

Simple Apparatus AS 60079.11

(OP)
I have an Zone 0 methane zone, with an RTD (PT100) connected to a ABB AI893 Barrier.  In order to ensure hazardous area safety i need to ensure this setup complies with the Entity Model or FISCO Model, however I don't know the maximum voltage and current the RTD can handle before it fries itself.
Does anyone have this information on the RTD, or know how to do this verification?

 

RE: Simple Apparatus AS 60079.11

If the RTD (and housing) is rated for Intrinsic Safe Zone 0 areas, and it is connected to an Intrinsic Safe barrier for Zone 0, then all is good.

RTDs produce voltage, so not sure what you mean by "fries itself"

Entity model and FISCO are for Fieldbus applications (Foundation, ProfiBus, etc).  Not for individual instrumentation...that I know of anyway.

You may get better response by posting this in the "Measurement & control instrumentation engineering" forum on this site.

______________________________________________________________________________
This is normally the space where people post something insightful.

RE: Simple Apparatus AS 60079.11

The barrier limits the current to the RTD. The RTD does not store energy so even if the RTD could be fried into a smoldering heap the barrier will have still restricted the energy to below ignition energy.

You should not be worrying about the RTD as an ignition point after feeding it correctly with an appropriate barrier.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Simple Apparatus AS 60079.11

(OP)
Thanks,

I agree with what you have said however, I need to show that I have connected the RTD to an appropriate barrier, by showing the RTD can withstand the maximum voltage and current that the barrier is capable of producing.  Similar to what I have done for the other instrumentaion.

RE: Simple Apparatus AS 60079.11

It's just a resistor.

Look on its data sheet for maximum allowed power dissipation.

But I am still puzzled by why? If the device doesn't store energy like batteries, capacitors, inductors, or ignitable chemicals,  you can hook it to the barrier and it can't ignite the hazard.  It could be a piece of dirt with wires stuck in it or wet hair.  The energy is greatly limited by the barriers and if the device wants to draw more, the barrier fuses go.

So since the barriers have to protect against a malfunction of the 'device' proving the device can handle the barrier power while the device is working correctly doesn't cover all cases.

Sometimes the RTD data sheet may say maximum voltage but usually not.
 

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close