A city has asked me to design a culvert to replace one that they say is in "bad shape". I look at the culvert and it is a cm arch culvert with concrete walls for footings and a concrete bottom. Its diameter is equivalent to 8' and is under a busy road, in a flowing stream. The problem seems to be, not the pipe, but severe erosion at the outlet. The stream has undermined the wing walls and there is a fall of about 4' from the pipe to the stream. There seems to be a better solution of fixing the outlet situation instead of replacing the culvert. Am I missing something? I don't want to tell the city that we can just fix the outlet situation and they tell me why it would need replacing, thus I look like the idiot!
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
The Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry is constantly looking for process improvements to better manage potential project delays and costs. Such issues are the result of project complexity, size, uniqueness and regulation, as well as the need for virtual team collaboration. Download Now