×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mass Code 7th Ed Chapter 34

Mass Code 7th Ed Chapter 34

Mass Code 7th Ed Chapter 34

(OP)
The new version (7th Ed) of the Massachusetts Building Code, Chapter 34 (Section 3408) classifies work related to alterations to existing buildings into different levels of work.  Level 2 work includes several different types of alterations, as defined in Section 3408.4.3, one of which is this:

"4. Increase in effective seismic weight, with or without structurally attached additions, up to a lifetime limit of 10% of the effective seismic weight of the building..."

If the alterations fall into the Level 2 classfication, the engineer is required to analyze the building for certain lateral loads per Section 3408.7.3.  

My concern is that this seems to be a particularly stringent requirement. Interpreting the code literally, if we add so much as one small piece of equipment to the structure, we are therefore increasing the seismic weight, so we would fall into Level 2 Work.  And that means we would have to do a lateral analysis of the existing building, which could be a significant effort depending on the structure.  

The preceding version of the Mass Code (6th ed) did not require a lateral analysis of the building if the weight increased by less than 10% (Sect 3408.4.3.2) and the alterations to the building do not reduce the lateral load capacity of the structure (Sect 3408.3.5).

So my questions are: Am I interpreting this provision in the 7th edition of the Mass. Code correctly?  Is there any wiggle room to this provision, so I can avoid performing a lateral analysis of the building?  What have other people been doing in situations like this?

Here is a link to chapter 34 of the Mass Code 7th edition: http://www.mass.gov/Eeops/docs/dps/inf/780CMR-1/780034.pdf

And here is a link to chapter 34 of the Mass Code 6th edition:  http://www.mass.gov/Eeops/docs/dps/BuildingCode/780034.pdf

Thanks in advance for your help!
  

RE: Mass Code 7th Ed Chapter 34

I think it is saying you can add up to 10% of the weight of the building without doing analyis..  Similiar to IBC.

Not familiar with the MA code - so I may be wrong..

RE: Mass Code 7th Ed Chapter 34

(OP)
Mike - I know what you're saying, relative to what IBC says.  The previous version of the Mass Code had a similar provision.  But in the new version of the Mass Code, I don't read it that way.  As I quoted above, it says "an increase...up to 10%" of the seismic weight pushes you into what they call Level 2 Work.  And once you're in Level 2, you have to show that the building can resist some minimum lateral loads.

RE: Mass Code 7th Ed Chapter 34

Try calling your local building dept -- maybe they can shed some on light on it and they have to to buy into what you do anyway....

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close