Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

stress corrosion cracking in 316 stainless steel

stress corrosion cracking in 316 stainless steel

stress corrosion cracking in 316 stainless steel

We have a pressure vessel which exhibits micro cracking in the vessel external surface (underneath lagging).
Can we safely weld io this surface.

RE: stress corrosion cracking in 316 stainless steel

The cracking is most likely chloride induced stress cracking.  When it is external, the most usual source for the chlorides is the insulation.  Weld repair of major cracks can sometimes be done.  However, usually the heat of welding will cause crack growth and/or new cracks to form.  

If the cracking is extensive, it could lead to catastrophic failure of the vessel.  In general, if a vessel has chloride stress cracking, it will need to be replaced.

RE: stress corrosion cracking in 316 stainless steel

Thanks for your observations which concurr with my opinions.
However,the situation I found myself in with regard to this pressure vessel working at 0.7barg at temp. of 50 degrs.C was complicated by the fact that this cracking was discovered when replacing a vessel leg support, This support required the welding of reinforcement pads to vessel shell (15mm.thk) and bottom dishing (25mm.thk)
It is true that grinding operation (preparation) exacerbated micro cracks,(this confirmed by DPI. examination)
The choice to be made during shutdown period was either continue with fitting of reinforcement pads or replace section of vessel shell.
It was my opinion that without further examination it was impossible to decide extent of chloride attack and therefore size of patch.
Before carrying out welding of pads,weldability tests was carried out on shell using 316welding rod (mma)
DPI. examination of test run indicated weld metal free of cracking.
Final DPI. of welded pads (fillet welds) show welds free from cracking in welds albeit plate material around welds do show signs of scc.

What is your considered opinion of this action and could you also expand on the possibility of catastrophic failure.

Finally, this vessel wil be monitored for leakage!.
I understand that good practice is sometimes to give outside surface a good 'wash' before re-instating correct type of insulation or vapour barrier.
Do you have any information on this?


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close