I have heard different debates regarding this issue and so I wanted to get everyone's thoughts. When you all size detention ponds for developments to limit peak post developed rate to peak existing condition flow rate, do you all account for the area of the pond in the inflow hydrographs. For example, if you have a 20 acre development with a 3 acre pond, would the total acreage of the inflow hydrographs be 20 acres or 17 acres. If you do account for the surface area of the pond, do you develop a weighted CN value for the overall inflow hydrograph? If so, do you use a CN value of 100 to represent the pond? If you use a 17 acre inflow hydrograph and a separate 3 acre hydrograph to represent the pond, than wouldn't the time of concentration for the pond be so low that you are pushing the limits of the SCS method? You would end up with a hydrograph with a CN of 100 and a tc of 2 minutes or so. This would generate a lot of volume. I've heard some say that unless the size of your pond is large (25 acres or more) than you don't need to account for the area of the pond because as soon as a drop of water hits the pond a drop will exist the pond. How do you all handle the acreage of the pond?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.