×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Related Articles

Jobs

Area of pond

Area of pond

Area of pond

(OP)
I have heard different debates regarding this issue and so I wanted to get everyone's thoughts. When you all size detention ponds for developments to limit peak post developed rate to peak existing condition flow rate, do you all account for the area of the pond in the inflow hydrographs. For example, if you have a 20 acre development with a 3 acre pond, would the total acreage of the inflow hydrographs be 20 acres or 17 acres. If you do account for the surface area of the pond, do you develop a weighted CN value for the overall inflow hydrograph? If so, do you use a CN value of 100 to represent the pond? If you use a 17 acre inflow hydrograph and a separate 3 acre hydrograph to represent the pond, than wouldn't the time of concentration for the pond be so low that you are pushing the limits of the SCS method? You would end up with a hydrograph with a CN of 100 and a tc of 2 minutes or so. This would generate a lot of volume. I've heard some say that unless the size of your pond is large (25 acres or more) than you don't need to account for the area of the pond because as soon as a drop of water hits the pond a drop will exist the pond. How do you all handle the acreage of the pond?

RE: Area of pond

The rainfall on the pond's surface is a legitimate pond inflow, just like the runoff from the surrounding ground, so it should be included in the model.  (It is no more likely to "exit the pond" immediately than any other inflow.)

Generating a separate "runoff" hydrograph and adding it to the other "inflows" is the best approach.  Use a CN or 98+ and the smallest Tc that your model will allow.  (Some models will allow Tc=0)  This causes most (or all) or the rainfall volume to "runoff" into the pond with little or no time delay.

Combining the pond surface area with another subcat is not recommended because (1) average CN values do not produce the same runoff as adding their separate hydrographs, and (2) the Tc values are probably different.

 

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
www.hydrocad.net
 

RE: Area of pond

Used a CN = 99 and lag time = 1 min in HEC HMS.
Indeed the program don't allow CN = 100 and Lag time = 0.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close