Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Slave element IAC

Slave element IAC

Slave element IAC

What type of IAC you consider be the best - a freqventie type or a step by step motor type.
Sorry for english

RE: Slave element IAC

I always preferred the frequency (solenoid) type over the stepper motor.  In my experience, faster response to changes, so engine RPM varies less (less stalling and flare) and they were less likely to get stuck.


RE: Slave element IAC

Hy, Blacksmith
  Your opinion is  the best but I need your opinion about driving mode of this. Is preferable to pilot this in variable freqv. or in variable amplitude.Majority of car makers prefere in frecv. modulation but I prefere variable amplitude mode because on my experience high freq. generators are not so reliable.
Sorry for english

RE: Slave element IAC

My experience again, was with frequency switching, not amplitude.  I found it to be satisfactory.  It was not so much a high frequency generator to my way of thinking, as it was a duty cycle modulation.  No power was zero and IAC was at minimum, continuous power application was 100% and IAC was at maximum, switching in between gave intermediate position.  As stated, it could go from say 25% to 50% faster than the engine could, so undershoot and overshoot of target RPM was minimized.  Amplitude, I think could be affected by resistance changes with temperature or corrosion accumulation on connections and introduce additional errors to be compensated for.


RE: Slave element IAC

Hy, Blacksmith,
   No, is wrong, amplitude modulation have same effect that freq. modulation.In both case the problem is only capability of slave element. Important is the law described in the electronical part.I have experience with a big freq. range and I,m satisfied for a 40 Hz. freq.In case of big freq. maybe 2-3KHz. problems with pulse generating are biggest. More if a few freq. sources are necesarry is possible to obtein unfavourable freq. composition. The singular advantage of freq. modulation is bracking of solid deposits (oily burned deposit)that appear on external mouving parts.
What opinion You have?
With big respect and sorry for my english.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close