×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Minimum Wall Thickness and Taper Threads

## Minimum Wall Thickness and Taper Threads

(OP)
The ASME B&PV code gives an eq'n to calculate minimum required pipe wall thickness for given pipe dimensions (OD,ID), design pressure and allowable stress on the pipe material.  The eq'n also includes an 'A' factor, which is to account for additional thickness required for, say, material removed due to threading.  For taper threads, the A value to be used is the thread depth.  This seems only to account for the thread depth, neglecting the taper of the thread itself.  Is the assumption in the code that NPT connections will be engaged all the way to the vanish threads and therefore the wall thickness reduction due to taper is not an issue?  Or is there a section of the code which allows one to neglect the wall thickness variation due to the taper entirely?  Any advice would be much appreciated.

### RE: Minimum Wall Thickness and Taper Threads

Which section of the code are you using?

(OP)
Section III

### RE: Minimum Wall Thickness and Taper Threads

A = an additional thickness to provide for material removed in threading, corrosion or erosion allowance, and material required for structural strength of the pipe during erection, as appropriate, in.

If the thread is in accordance with B2.1

[Pipe OD - (PD @ Beginning Thread - Height of Thread)] / 2

= Contribution to A from NPT thread

### RE: Minimum Wall Thickness and Taper Threads

(OP)
Thanks RCHandy, I can see that this is the approach that has been typically taken for dealing with taper threads.

What I am wondering is: does the code require one to consider the gradual reduction in wall thickness due to the taper itself?  If the mating (female) fitting does not engage the entire thread (up to the vanish threads), theoretically, there will be a minimum wall thickness less than that calculated using the method you described above.

Any thoughts?

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!