×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

contact problem with abaqus

contact problem with abaqus

contact problem with abaqus

(OP)
Hi all,
I am studying a contact problem between two plates of steel under abaqus.
I would like to know why results are better with using hexaedric elements than tetraedric and why linear elements are better for contact than quadratic elements.
Then, to locate where crack could be, what should I show, Von Mises stress, Max principal stress...?
thanks in advance for your help.
your answer will help me to explain my problem and my results.
nick
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: contact problem with abaqus

1) Why hexahedral elements are better than tetrahedral:
This has to do with formulation of the two elements.  This is apart from contact--for the same order of interpolation the hexahedral elements perform better than tetrahedrals.

2) Why are first-order elements better in contact than 2nd order:
This is another formulational issue.  Without getting deep into formulational issues, imagine a book laying on a desk.  Away from the edge of the book, the contact will be a constant-pressure situation.  This plays itself out as a flat-line linear force transfer.  The polynomial element cannot handle this, due to how it is formulated.  Instead one gets a parabolic response. For 2nd order quadrilateral faces, this results in "negative" force response at the corner nodes.  For triangular faces, it results in zero force at teh corners.  The effective plot looks like a checkerboard, instead of a constant contact pressure.

3) To locate the crack . . .
It depends on the material and what assumptions one is making.  Some people use a particular stress or strain measurment, others use energies.  This answer is very problem-dependent.

Hope this helps.
Brad

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close