×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...
2

Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

(OP)
I have been asked to work on an interesting project.  The client is a Dance Studio where dance classes are taught.  The Architect (interior designer) originally received a permit from the building department to modify the floorplan for 3 dance studios on the 2nd floor of an old three story 1920's Hotel (in Florida).

1st Problem: Her plan required the demo of 3 load bearing walls.

2nd Problem: Existing structure was not designed for 100psf (Dance Hall / Ballroom - live loading)

3rd Problem: I was originally told that the floor loading was not an issue as the building department classified it as "business occupancy"

It turns out that the building department was actually speaking in turns of the life saftey plan.

Based upon the original permit the owner has already performed 90% of the construction and now she is being required to show that the floor can handle 100psf live load (this is where I come in... yeah!)

My 1st question is: Based upon knowledge of the intended use of the rooms (max size 610sf) and max occupancy (based upon 15sf/per person the Max room occupancy is 40 individuals.  At 250lbs per person statically we are talking about 16.4psf live load. From what I can tell the original structure has at least 40-50psf capacity.  This results in a 2.4 to 3 factor for impact loading (before any standard code saftey factors come into play)... Can this be used to modify the requirements of the code?

My logic is based on the fact that a stadium with fixed seating (approx. 6 sf per person) is designed only for 60psf... and using the same 250lbs person (drunk and jumping up and down screaming for their favorite team) results in 41.67psf static and a impact factor of only 1.44?

My belief is that the 100psf is for DANCE HALLS or BALLROOMS which are both assembly occupancies and as such can result in localized concentrations of people and therefore for saftey the entire floor should be designed to handle this.

In this this case the Client is only capable of teaching a MAX of 20 individuals which results in a static loading of 8.2 psf and a resultant SF of 4.87 (at 40psf LL).

I currently can rationalize this in my mind but I do not know my limitations when trying to prove this (or if it is even allowed by code).

Any and all help would be a great help,

Thanks, Joe

RE: Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

This is not an assembly occupancy.  Instead of a dancehall or ballroom, it is a classroom.  It will do you no good to rationalise the live loading based on actual weight of the people, etc.  I would check and/or reinforce the floor for classroom loading and present my case to the building official.

RE: Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

You can't take an estimated number of people - their weight/the area and come up with a design live load.  You can "understand" the loading that way, but you can't, or shouldn't, certify the floor for a code-defined use at a lower load than what the code actually defines it.

The only out would be to write a report/request to the local building department and request a waiver, or opinion, of an acceptable live load based on the intended occupancy.

I would argue that a dance classroom does serve a function, at times, as a public assembly.  My own daughter took years of dance classes in a building where many times there was a shoulder-to-shoulder crowd watching at one end.  This certainly would fall under a public assembly - no fixed seating condition.

Stadiums, with fixed seats, fall under the 60 which is similar to public assembly-fixed seating = 50 psf.

 

RE: Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

Cancel my earlier opinion.  JAE is correct.  If your loading code gives a loading for a "dance studio" or "dance classroom", that is what you have to use.  If not, request a determination as suggested.

RE: Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

(OP)
Thanks hokie66 and JAE,

I spoke with the local building official (who is a retired GC... nice) and he is accepting a comparison of the loading (between fixed stadium and classroom) to justify my use of the loading.

JAE, I would normally agree with you that it would be assembly but this case is an except due to the very small class size.  I a new structure over 750sf in size I would use the Dance Hall / Ballroom loading because more than 50 people can congregate in one area.

Thanks again, Joe

RE: Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

Dynamics likely may be an issue, also...

Dik

RE: Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

Canadian Codes permit design for a stipulated occupant load, i.e. max posted limit. A class room load of 50 psf would be reasonable as long as an assembly occupant load of greater than 60 persons is not reached with in the floor space.  At that point you would need to consider assembly loading.

Design for 50 psf and post the max permitted occupant load if your floor space would permit greater than 60 persons based on square footage occupant load. ( assuming your codes permit this design rationale

RE: Dance Classroom Live Loading 100psf - this is a long one...

Structural Joe,
You are doing the right thing by getting an opinion from the building department.

Dik is also correct in that you should check dynamic effects.  This is a very real problem and is especially so on long spans - which I'm guessing you now have.  At the very least you should check all long spans using 18/SQRT(deflection).  You probably should have a more sophisticated analysis.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close