×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Pls address

Pls address

Pls address

(OP)
How to use the existing pneumatic controller with the DCS system?

RE: Pls address

Is the pneumatic controller local or in a control room?  If control room is it two pipe or four pipe?

http://www.scanivalve.com/ Scanivalve used to make a pneumatic multiplexer to sample the pneumatic signals in an old control room.  This may still be available.  I would rather replace everything with new electronic transmitters, DCS IO and digital valve positioners.  Electronic transmitters have lots more precision (thus greater turndown) and are rugged and reliable.  Consider replacing the pneumatic controllers.  You could add a pressure transmitter on the pneumatic signal if the pneumatic controller uses a pneumatic transmitter instead of process connected.  I would prefer a new electronic process transmitter wired to the DCS.

RE: Pls address

I completely agree with JLSeagull.

Change to electronic tranmsiiters and valve positioner.

I trust this helps,
Mlv
http://www.coulton.com

RE: Pls address

A P/I pressure to current transducer will do the job.  I'm assuming you are trying to just indicate the measured variable to the DCS?

These were/are very common where a lot of pneumatic plant is gradually converted to DCS, or to avoid conversion in hazardous areas.
 

RE: Pls address

I had a local company build us a cabinet with P/I and I/P's put in the cabinet.We mounted it next to the new PLC and tubed the signals in and out from the old pnematic memonic board.  It worked perfectly.  We had the deltaV screens redraw to look just like the old board and the operators didn't miss a lick.

It was 1/10 the cost in 1/3 the time.  The cut over was done on the fly, one loop at a time.  No need for postioners as the valves and the loops were already tuned and calibrated.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close