×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Implied center for diameters - Y14.5
3

Implied center for diameters - Y14.5

Implied center for diameters - Y14.5

(OP)
In ANSI Y14.5, I found the implied 90 degrees rule for center lines and lines shown at right angles (2.1.1.2)
I am asking if anyone knows of a similar guideline concerning diameters shown on the same centerline as being "implied" to be concentric within a certain tolerance (such as the block tolerances).

I don't think it's there anywhere but I wanted to get this discussion group's feedback.

If it isn't there, I plan on adding a general note to the effect of " Unless otherwise specified, all diameters shown to be on the same center line are to be concentric within .010"

The purpose of this note is to provide a type of "block tolerance" for diameters that the designers are somewhat concerned about but don't see the need to specifically address their location (as in non-mating features)

Any comments or suggestions?

---awol

RE: Implied center for diameters - Y14.5

Funny thing about Y14.5 is that it is Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing.  People always seem to forget about the dimensioning part and focus only on the tolerancing.

Assuming you have the decimal place tolerance shown somewhere on your drawing, commonly the title block (i.e. .XX=+/-.015 .XXX=+/-.005), then if you dimension to the center line, both diameters are dimensioned and therefore have to be concentric withing the specified default tolerances, or block tolerances as I understand how you refer to them.  Of course, that doesn't account for circularity or diameter tolerances, which at MMC or LMC, may seem to put the diameters out of concentric.

--Scott

RE: Implied center for diameters - Y14.5

ASME Y14.5M-1994, paragraph 2.7.3 defines the default interpretation for features shown on center.  It states:

"2.7.3 Relationship Between Individual Features.  The limits of size do not control the orientation or location relationship between individual features. Features shown perpendicular, coaxial, or symmetrical to each other must be controlled for location or orientation to avoid incomplete drawing requirements. These controls may be specified by one of the methods given in Sections 5 and 6."

Your idea about adding a general note as a default for features implied to be on center is better than nothing at all.  But you still run the risk of letting the drawing user make the choice of how the "zero" is established for making the measurements.  Five different inspectors might have five different ways of doing it, yeilding five different answers.  

I feel it is always better to define the datum and use an appropriate geometric tolerance to define the desired relationship.  That way, there is no question as to the requirement.

GDT_GUY

RE: Implied center for diameters - Y14.5

There is the ISO standards covering the subject:
ISO 2768-1:1989 General tolerances; Part 1: Tolerances for linear and angular dimensions without individual tolerance indications
and

ISO 2768-2:1989 General tolerances; Part 2: Geometrical tolerances for features without individual tolerance indications

I did not see yet any drawing (metric or inch based) where the GD&T would be specified by these standards.
Even the best standard is worthless if the people working with the drawings do not know it. It is safer to put  all requirements on the drawings.

gearguru

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close