Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Finding the CORRECTED octave band sound pressure levels

Finding the CORRECTED octave band sound pressure levels

Finding the CORRECTED octave band sound pressure levels

Hi everyone,
I have got a curious question and am wondering if I can get some clarification from you experts out there.
I am given a typical calibration chart (V/Pa) for a free-field microphone.
On the chart I am given the free-field response and the pressure response for a typical free-field microphone, where the free field response graph is fairly straight at 0dB, while the pressure response starts droping down at about 1000Hz.

I am also given the following data,
At 2000Hz  the (pressure level) Lp=92 re 2*10^-5 Pa
Also at 2000Hz (x-axis on the graph) extending a vertical line up to the response curve and then a horizontal line up to the y-axis, I obtain the following value:

My objective is to find the CORRECTED octave band sound pressure levels.

Would any be kind enough to direct me to the correct way to attack this problem??
Thank you in Advance.

RE: Finding the CORRECTED octave band sound pressure levels

Without knowing the details of the calibration chart. I would interpret it as follows:

The calibration chart shows the sensitivity of the microphone output voltage to an input pressure. A sensitivity of -0.5 dB at 2000 Hz on the chart means that it is LESS sensitive than it is at lower frequencies, ie it reads a smaller pressure than is actually present. The reading you get from the microphone needs to be INCREASED to compensate for this. So if the pressure measured by the microphone is 92 dB SPL @ 2kHz, when you are assuming that the sensitivity of the mic is that at low frequencies, then the actual SPL will be 92.5 dB SPL.

You may well find that a difference of 0.5 dB is small compared to the variance of a number of repeated measurements and is therefore not very significant. Also additional factors such as directivity may be more important at high frequencies.


RE: Finding the CORRECTED octave band sound pressure levels

Yep! that makes sense. I was getting confused on how to interpret the values that i obtained from the chart to the values that were given to me... but your post made it all clear..
I would like to thank you very much for this helpful post Michael, i really do appreciate it.
Thank you

RE: Finding the CORRECTED octave band sound pressure levels

I think the actual interpretation of your calibration data might be just a little different.
The two values you are given are for use of the same mike as a "free field" mike or as a "pressure field" mike.
A "free field" mike is used for making sound level measurements in accordance with IEC Type 1,  while a "pressure field" mike is used for ANSI Type 2 measurements.

Free-field-response microphones are used for measuring sound coming mainly from one direction. Their frequency-response curve is designed to compensate for the pressure build-up at the diaphragm caused by interference and diffraction effects. Measured sound-pressure levels are therefore equal to those that would exist in the sound  field if the microphone were not present.
Pressure-response microphones do not compensate for the pressure build-up at the microphone diaphragm — they measure the actual sound- pressure level at the diaphragm. Uses include measuring sound- pressure levels at a surface (if the microphone is flush-mounted), or in a closed cavity (where the microphone is part of the cavity wall). Pressure-response microphones can be used as free- field microphones if they are oriented at right-angles to the direction of sound propagation — but their effective frequency range is then reduced.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Simulation-Driven Design With SOLIDWORKS
Simulation-driven design can reduce the time and cost of product development. In this engineering.com eBook, we’ll explore how SOLIDWORKS users can access simulation-driven design through the SOLIDWORKS Simulation suite of analysis tools. Download Now
eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close