×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

why choose one pressure angle versus another

why choose one pressure angle versus another

why choose one pressure angle versus another

(OP)
I notice that many suppliers offer both spur and
worm gears with differing pressure angles.  I know
that the pressure angles or the gears must be compatible,
but my question is "why choose one PA versus another"?
For instance, if the a gear is available with the same
DP, face width, etc.  why choose 14.5 degree versus 20
or visa versa?

[I'm looking to learn more abour gears in order to
build my own motorized telescope platform.  Any web
sites with introductory level info would also be helpful.]

Jeff Anderson-Lee

RE: why choose one pressure angle versus another

14.5 is the "old" standard. It was developed from an even earlier "composite" standard which combined cycloidal and involute gear profiles. I believe this is still used in watches and clocks. A variant of composite is used for molded plastic gears.

20 degree gears are stronger, suffer less from undercutting for small numbers of teeth.
Supposedly they increase forces tending to push gears apart, but I have never seen a case where this is a problem.

Worms sometimes use even greater angles for more strength.

20 degree gears should be chosen in 99.9% of cases.

Some references: Guillet's Kinematics of Machines, Machinery's Handbook. Marks Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers.

RE: why choose one pressure angle versus another

The standard specifying 14.5 pressure angle gears was discontinued in the early 1970's. As there are thousands of inch pitch gears with this pressure angle in use, numerous stock gear suppliers still manufacture to the old standard.

20 degree gears are the standard throughout Europe and Asia and they have been the standard in the US with the publication of AGMA specfication 2001-B88.

The advantage of 14.5 degrees is a smoother mesh, resulting in lower noise. The disadvantages are less strength and a higher threshold for undercutting.

While 20 degrees is the current standard, there are many applications where a 25 degree pressure angle is used. These are applications where a strong gear is required but the number of teeth needs to be small and there are no restrictions on noise.

RE: why choose one pressure angle versus another

Historical note:  The 14.5 degree pressure angle was first chosen because its sine is very close to 0.25, which simplified calculations.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now
White Paper - Comparing Multi-Patterning at 5nm: SADP, SAQP, and SALELE
Self-aligned multi-patterning techniques such as SADP, SAQP, and SALELE are increasingly popular at advanced nodes, but each process has its pros and cons. IMEC and Mentor, a Siemens business collaborated to identify potentially less-obvious process and design limitations and trade-offs between the three SAMP techniques. Learn more in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close