Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

South Whidbey - Woodinville Fault 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
msquared48

msquared48

Structural
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
14,745
Location
US
A friend (non-engineer type) toled me this weekend that they heard some new information on this fault on a TV news broadcast last week.

Supposedly, some new information regarding this fault was discovered from recent activity on an adjacent fault. It's now supposedly rated somewhere between a magnitude 8.0 to 9.0 on a possible future event. This magnitude rivals the Cascadia Subduction zone effect and I find it very hard to believe, although the faults are only separated by about 300 miles as the crow flies.

Can anyone verify this? I did not see any news information.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
recent article

i'm not up to speed on that area, but this article mentions M7.5...jumping from M7.5 to 9 is a huge jump and seems a little far, but again, i've not done a lot of reading on that particular fault. the latest usgs report suggests a M7.5 for that specific fault. (search "whidbey" and you'll see the references).
here's another usgs report turned up with a quick search.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thanks. I'll take a look. Sounds like they probably misread the article, assigning 8 to 9 to a 7.5. Anything for print, right?

FYI, the last link comes up unavailable.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
From reading another recent article, the UGGS is now saying that the Seattle Fault, a long recognized hazard at a 7.2 level, may be a lateral branch of this same Whidbey fault, now rated at 7.5+. It's also interesting that they now think that the longer the faultline, the greater the larger quake potential. Makes sense from an energy - spring theory - level.

And the light gets brighter... I just hope it's not magma breaking the surface... [nosmiley]

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

bradlawson25
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Building on a mountain side with fault lines
Replies
6
Views
441
Mccoy
Mccoy
mcr07
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Maximum Ss and S1 in Southern California
Replies
3
Views
180
mcr07
mcr07
JAE
  • Locked
  • News News
San Andreas Fault Rumblings
Replies
0
Views
70
JAE
JAE
msquared48
  • Locked
  • Question Question
New Fault Discovered Under Olympic Mountains?
Replies
0
Views
125
msquared48
msquared48
RustyDuster
  • Locked
  • Question Question
Seismic Zones in South America
Replies
2
Views
151
msucog
msucog

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top