Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Polar Moment of Inertia Incorrect for Beam Sections?

Polar Moment of Inertia Incorrect for Beam Sections?

Polar Moment of Inertia Incorrect for Beam Sections?

Hello All,

I am sitting here scratching my head wondering if Mechanica's beam section polar moment of intertia (J) is incorrect.

For example, take a 2x2 inch square solid bar.  According to hand calculations J = 2.667 in^4.  Modeling the 2x2 solid bar in Pro/Engineer and analyzing the crossectional properties (Analysis -> Model -> XSection Mass Properties) it also comes up with 2.667 in ^4.

However, in Mechanica when you create a new beam section as square with an "a" dimension of 2 and then click "Review" the polar moment of inertia is displayed as 2.25 in^4.

Am I missing something here?  This looks to be wrong.  I know Mechanica has serious problems in calculating the J for custom sketched sections, but this is bizzare.

Any thoughts?



RE: Polar Moment of Inertia Incorrect for Beam Sections?

I think I just answered  my own question.  The J shown on the Review screen for the beam properties is only the polar moment of inertia if the cross section is circular.  For all non-circular crossections (including open sections) this value "J" is actually the torsional K factor for beams, which for non-circular sections is typically a fraction of the true polar moment of inertia J for the section.  

It would be nice to have PTC make sure that the variable name is "K" not "J" for all sketched and non-circular beam cross sections.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close