Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

MSE soil parameters for global stability analysis

MSE soil parameters for global stability analysis

MSE soil parameters for global stability analysis

What value of c and phi are appropriate for the material (compacted sand) in an MSE wall?  Obviously the sand must have a phi of about 36 degrees.  However, when running a global stability analysis, there must be some theoretical c, otherwise the wall cannot stand vertically. I seem to remember giving it a c of 800 psf. Another way I have seen it done is to put an extremely rigid layer at the base of the wall so that a failure circle does not pass through it.  I use XSTABL for my analyses.

RE: MSE soil parameters for global stability analysis

That is how I analyze walls.  I make the wall mass ridged with a high fiction and cohesion to force the failure circles outside the wall.  I do a seporate analysis to make sure the wall mass is stable

RE: MSE soil parameters for global stability analysis

Dear guys,

I don't think you can get a material call sand with such a high cohesion. The c in sand depeds on the confining pressure of the test( CIU or CID). c normally don't used in MSE with sand as fill, even you compact it. Soils don't normally behave as you wish


RE: MSE soil parameters for global stability analysis

I agree with Austgino in that the sand does not have a cohesion value.  MSE walls are able to stand vertically due to the stress transfer in the system, not because of the cohesion in the material.  However, I do agree with the design approach taken by bosy and basford for checking global stability.  When using xstabl, I assume that the internal stability of the reinforced fill has already been checked and that only external stability is a concern.  In that case, giving the reinforced fill section high strength values to force the failure outside of the reinforced block is also the way I would approach the analysis.

I also have a question regarding drainage of MSE walls.  What is the typical behind wall drainage specifications in your areas?  Do you just require a free-draining gravel/drainage system directly behind the wall facing or do you require it at the back of the reinforced fill section/face of cut as well?

Your experiences would be greatly appreciated.

RE: MSE soil parameters for global stability analysis

When analyzing for global stability you just want to make sure that the wall is very rigid and stable. Just use very high values of the c and phi. You do not want any failure surface to cross the MSE wall anyway.

Dimitris P. Zeccos

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
White Paper - Comparing Multi-Patterning at 5nm: SADP, SAQP, and SALELE
Self-aligned multi-patterning techniques such as SADP, SAQP, and SALELE are increasingly popular at advanced nodes, but each process has its pros and cons. IMEC and Mentor, a Siemens business collaborated to identify potentially less-obvious process and design limitations and trade-offs between the three SAMP techniques. Learn more in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close