×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

(OP)
Could anybody tell me the MDMT of ASTM A36 steel for designing 35 psi MAWP pneumatic tank? Based on discussion of Sam Cheung et al, I am under the impression that as per ASME COde Sec VIII, Fig UCS 66 M, the minimum temperature recommended without the need to conduct Impact test is +20 deg. F or -7 deg. C.
Someother information I received from steel supplier is not to be used below 5 deg. C.
Any shed of light on this matter is much appreciated

RE: ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

If this pneumatic tank is built to ASME B&PV Code, Section VIII< Div 1, you cannot use ASTM A 36 outright. The material should be certified to ASME SA 36. Once this is completed, the requirements of UCS-6 would apply for using SA 36 plate material, which by the way is limited to 5/8" or less.

Regarding MDMT, this information can be found in Figure UCS-66, and unfortunately, your MDMT is limited to Curve A in Figure UCS-66, which for the 5/8" maximum thickness limit would be right around 38 deg F w/o impact testing, and 20 deg F for material thickness less than 0.394".

RE: ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

(OP)
Thank you Sir for your prompt reply. There was a string of email back in May 2005 in the same forum that says :"Per the 2003 Addendum SA36 is identical to ASTM A36/A36M-00a".

And another one says :"They have the same chemistry and properties, but there may be differences in testing and documentation.They are not interchangable.
In many businesses virtually all material is dual certified to the ASTM/ASME standards. "

Can you please clarify the difference between the straight ASTM A36 and ASME SA 36?

Many thanks.

RE: ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

You need to review the ASME material specification - SA 36. The material may be dual certified, however, they are not interchangeable specifications. If you are building this vessel to ASME Code, you must have have access to the appropiate material specification(s).

RE: ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

listen to what people are telling you

it is identical up to a point.

De-coiled plate (which much of if is in the thickness you are contemplating) is not treated the same and is exempt from the "identical" rules until the decoil processor levels, squares, and recertifys the material.

that being said, a-36 is really a structural plate with poor grain structure, poor manufacturing methods, and really should not be used for a pressure vessel.  Look at the heading description in Section II

the energy, even at 35 psi, stored in a compressed air vessel can kill, and that should be a major concern.

there is no real cost differential in a-36 up to a "real" pressure vessel quality plate

RE: ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

wijaya1, it appears to me that, for Sec VIII, Div. 1 work, SA-36 may be assigned an MDMT of -20 F., if meeting all the requirements of UG-20(f). In this case your thickness would be limited to 1/2", which, I would think, would be sufficient for a 35 psi vessel, if not "too" large.

Having said that I agree that SA-516 would be a MUCH better choice.

Regards,

Mike

RE: ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

(OP)
Thank you for all the valuable responses and feedbacks.

RE: ASTM A36 MDMT for 35 psi pneumatic tank

Seems like most of the A36 plate we see is shown as ASTM A36/ SA 36/ A709 (I think that's a bridge spec).  Look on the mill test reports or ask the supplier.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close