Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


tolerance of investment castings ISO2768

tolerance of investment castings ISO2768

tolerance of investment castings ISO2768

Hi Everybody,

I'm working in a steel foundry in China.
I have a customer in Germany and have some metal parts to be remade by investment casting process. Originally these parts are complete machining parts in Germany.

On the drawing, general tolerance is according to ISO2768 mk. But I suppose it should be machining tolerance, not casting tolerance because it's very tight such as 8+/-0.1mm

Am I right or not? The customer is a trading company and they even don't have an engineer in casting industry.

RE: tolerance of investment castings ISO2768

I believe ISO 2768 does lean toward machining.

I don't have time to look at it now but will if I get a chance at lunch.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: tolerance of investment castings ISO2768

a little last I see, but:

First thing I have to ask, is this drawing really a raw-cast/forged part drawing or is it actually a finished component drawing?  Do the tolerances on some key features appear to use tolerances only capable by machining? (Controlled independently of the ISO 2768 general tolerance)  I ask this cause quite often a customer will send out only the desired finished part and rely completely on the casting/forging company to create the raw/base part as needed to meet the finished part geometry.  This is how my company typically works, as it allows much freedom for the casting/forging supplier and also relieves us, the customer, of the responsibility of the entire casting/forging process.

Yes, ISO 2768 mK is used as a general tolerance control on finished/machined parts, with „m“ meaning medium tolerance on Linear and Angular dimensions, and „K“ meaning medium tolerance on geometrical features (straightness, flatness, perpendicularity, symmetry, and runnout)  It does not give a fixed +/-0.x dimension, but actually the „implied“ tolerance depends on the size of the feature being controlled.  (I also am not a fan of this ISO 2768, as I feel it is used by lazy engineers who do not fully understand the entirely of the Specification… but I don’t want to get into that here)

DIN 1688 parts 1-4 is the normally used in Germany Standard for General Tolerances of different casting methods (Sand, Gravity, Pressure Die).  A typical tolerance using this standard usually reads DIN 1688 – GTA 13/5, where the last part is the tolerance grade. (linear and geometrical feature controls)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Evolving Landscape of Commercial Battery-Powered Trucks
What’s driving the evolving landscape of truck electrification? What are the barriers, motivators and strategies for accelerating the electric transition? What insights and resources are available for today’s design engineers working to achieve industry disruption and evolution? For answers to these and other pertinent questions, read this white paper. Download Now
eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close