Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Dynamic Compaction Vibrations

Dynamic Compaction Vibrations

Dynamic Compaction Vibrations

I am looking for a way to predict the generated vibration levels in ips from dynamic compaction by weight dropping at various weights, heights, base materials, and distances.

RE: Dynamic Compaction Vibrations

Check with Hayward-Baker Foundations.  They likely have some info like you are seeking.

RE: Dynamic Compaction Vibrations

There is a very good article about vibrations generated vby dynamic compaction in "Revue Française de Géotechnique" N°14 bis march 1981.
It gives for 200 tm to 300 tm energy ( weight x drop height ) the following attenuation formula : V ( in mm/s ) = 340 x d to the power -1.1 with d in meters

RE: Dynamic Compaction Vibrations

I have not read the "Revue francaise de geotechnique" paper , but you could find part of your answer in a paper published in the ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol 110, no6 June 1984 pages 757- 774. The Title is " Ground Response to Dynamic Compaction" by Paul Mayne, John Jones and Jean Dumas.

In this paper, the authors suggest a conservative upper limit for peak particle velocity of:
PPV  < 70*(sqrt(W*H)/d)^1.4
Where PPV is the vector sum in mm/sec (1 ips = 25.4 mm/s)
W weight of tamper in tonne (1 tonne = 1000 kg =2204.6 lb)
H drop height in meter (1 meter= 3.2808 feet)
d distance from the drop point in meter
This limit is based on 14 case studies. The authors don't discuss the effect of the type of soil, but based on my own experience vibrations tend to travel easily in clayey material, which has for effect that peak particle velocities tend to be higher. Also, vibration levels tend to be higher as the soils get compacted during the process.
Typical  worst case scenario values are 2 ips at 30 feet, 1 ips at 60 feet, and 0.5 ips at 100 feet, which is something you could measure at the end of compaction on a granular material when using a 20 ton tamper falling from about 80 to 100 feet. You don't typically get this with a 15 ton tamper falling from 60 ft.

Hope it can help you!

RE: Dynamic Compaction Vibrations

Marc59 --  Thanks, on the TerraSystems web site I found the same relationship in English (traditional) units as PPV = 8*(((W*H)^0.5)^1.7)with PPV in ips, W in tons, and H and d in feet.  I have e-mailed Paul Mayne at Georgia Tech for more details.  If I can't come up with the 1984 article from him, I may ask you for a copy as my files only go back to 1991.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
White Paper - Comparing Multi-Patterning at 5nm: SADP, SAQP, and SALELE
Self-aligned multi-patterning techniques such as SADP, SAQP, and SALELE are increasingly popular at advanced nodes, but each process has its pros and cons. IMEC and Mentor, a Siemens business collaborated to identify potentially less-obvious process and design limitations and trade-offs between the three SAMP techniques. Learn more in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close