Nice processor but needs more memory, more pins, and
a C compiler. The TV stuff looks cool.



http://www.parallax.com/dl/docs/prod/prop/PropellerDSv0.3.pdf

There's a 160 MHz version coming up. It will have 64 I/O pins.

Needs a C compiler? It depends a lot. I have used the native SPIN language. It is quite elegant. I am more productive with this little chip than I ever have been. (Using PICs and 8051 derivatives before).

I use it for little hand-held applications. Not much memory needed there. I guess that's why I find it attractive.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

Just tried to go to their website for the first time... no answer.  That's not a good sign for me.  Nor is only one person  being involved in 80% of a chip's design, since anything happening to him means it's a good bet there won't be many more like it coming along in the future.  I'd love to look at it, been meaning to for a while now, but this isn't the best first impression...

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

Hiya-

Not to throw a fly in the ointment, but NTSC (never the same color) is being phased out in the US.  What is the migration path to the "new" digital formats that are coming out?  Has there been any talk on their forums about that?

Is there a hardware codec planned for it?  THAT would be cool as I could think of all sorts of mixed video feeds for that.

Neat architecture in any event.

  Cheers,

   Rich S.

Dan,

No activity on their website?

You bet. Perhaps even more than Eng-Tips. The Parallax fora are extremely active.

Try again! "Not a good sign to me"... Huh?

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

By "no activity" I meant the site came back with a "Site is not responding error"... it happens, but it certainly doesn't get a first-time looker like me excited about a company.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

Is this the address you tried?

http://www.parallax.com/

It has worked everytime. I tested it less than a minute ago - it worked then.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

It looks like all the bits used to address data are used.  The instruction set would need to change if more memory was added.   It also looks like some bits are wasted..    There is no mulitply or divide and the zero flag doesn't seem to be used often.

I see this is as more of a curiosity.    I am sure the propeller chip will find its uses but I will stick to DSPs and risc CPUs for now.  I would need a 32x32 to 64 bit mulitply so I can follow oit up with a 64 /32 = 32 rem 32 divide before I would consider this chip.    More memory is needed too.

Yeah. As I said. Mostly sneezing.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

It looks like great fun to me.  Wish I had a need for it now.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

"When there's a chip - there's a need"  

Actually. I can understand some of the reactions. If you do heavy stuff and need the safety that intel, TI, Moto (or whatever they put on their door-mat now) and their brethren offer (if real or not can be discussed).

But. For a large percentage of those who design in a less stringent environment (no SIL, no large team, modest standardization requirements, mostly bit-banging and control and not so much signal processing), there are other things that count.

Things like real parallel processing, eight processors sharing memory. Very exact timing. No problem with interrupts, their priorities and possible interaction that takes days to nail down. A novel (that's perhaps the problem?) language that is easily mastered. Low current consumption and a low price. Plus 16 very able 32 bit counters with more operational modes than you could imagine. Peripherals? No. None of them, except a VGA (or PAL or NTSC) generator attached to every processor. But, since there are objects in the library that turn any of the processors into a full duplex UART, an SPI interface or almost anything you may need, that doesn't hurt a bit.

It is a fun and able chip. I can understand the sneezing - I even anticipated it. But it isn't a very constructive way to look at things.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

What surprised me about these Parallax processors is the low power requriements.  The smallest uses just 1 milliwatt.

I've been looking at the robot hobby and single board computers lately and find there seems to be something at every level, all the way from these microcontrollers to full blown PCs.

For industrial use, I think the PLCs and PACs are great because of the convienence and choices of IO add on's available.  In that environment, engineers are very pressed for time and need ready made solutions.

Eric
http://www.icpdas-usa.com

Oops!  I meant 1 mA above.  Power is 5V * 1 mA = 5 milliwatts