×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Solver problem numerical singularity when tying surfaces together

Solver problem numerical singularity when tying surfaces together

Solver problem numerical singularity when tying surfaces together

(OP)
one face of a part instance meshed with S8R5(8 node doubly curved thin shell, reduced integration, 5 dof per node) is tied(tie surface) to a face of a part meshed with C3D8R elements.
During the calculation, i have this warning :
SOLVER PROBLEM. NUMERICAL SINGULARITY WHEN PROCESSING NODE
             RAIDISSEUR-1.24587 D.O.F. 6 RATIO = 3.21587E+12.
(Raidisseur is the part meshed with S8R5)

How should i resolve this problem? should i use S8R6?

in fact, the results i m getting are a little strange ...is this non accuracy of results due to the singularity?
thank u

RE: Solver problem numerical singularity when tying surfaces together

Are you using a mesh tie (*TIE) or a shell to solid coupling (*SHELL TO SOLID COUPLING)?

Martin

Martin Stokes CEng MIMechE

RE: Solver problem numerical singularity when tying surfaces together

(OP)
I m using tie
When i changed the shell elements to S8R6 (6 degrees of freedom for the shell), i dont have this warning anymore.
Do u advice me to use shell to solid coupling?

RE: Solver problem numerical singularity when tying surfaces together

I've never really used shell to solid coupling, but I would guess that it would be the preferred method for transitioning a mesh from shells to solids.

Give it a try and compare the two for stress/displacement  continuity across the interface.

Martin

Martin Stokes CEng MIMechE

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close