×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fluid flow through a nozzle

Fluid flow through a nozzle

Fluid flow through a nozzle

(OP)
Hello.

I am attempting to perform an unsteady fluid flow analysis on a nozzle in Algor, but continue to get convergence errors.  The nozzle has a .25 inch inlet on the top.  The outlet is a 3.6" X .03" outlet on the bottom.  I set the inlet at .02 m/s and the outlet is set as a prescribed inlet/outlet.

I've tried setting the load curve up in several different configurations (0, 2, 4, and 6 sec increments with 3 steps per time step and a multiplier of 1....also tried starting w/ a multiplier of 0 as recommended by algor, etc...).

Algor gives me the error: "The solution did not meet convergence criteria, try the following"  and lists "1) reduce the loading, 2) relax the convergence criteria, 3) increase the # of interations, 4)change the type of norm (IRE=0 or 1)"

Does anyone know of any documention regarding fluid flow analysis or have any recommendations on time steps etc.?

Thanks in advance,
Jesse

RE: Fluid flow through a nozzle

I'm not a fluid flow wizard, but for unsteady flow, that doesn't seem like nearly enough steps per time unit.  Even at 0.02m/s, you are looking at it traveling 0.007 meters (or 7 mm) which is a pretty good distance for a nozzle that is only 3.6" long.  The other comment I would have would be to watch your units.  You've cited inches and meters in the problem statement.

To capture better behavior, I may try as many as 100 steps per second, but at a minimum, I would give 10 a try.

Garland

Garland E. Borowski, PE
Borowski Engineering & Analytical Services, Inc.
Lower Alabama SolidWorks Users Group
Magnitude The Finite Element Analysis Magazine for the Engineering Community

RE: Fluid flow through a nozzle

The Algor help files give good guidance for setting these parameters, even to the point of equations based on fluid velocity and size of model.  There are several solvers that you occasionally have to try back and forth (see the help files for good descriptions of when to use each).  You can also try slowing things down to make sure your model works or to test out different solvers and parameters.  Watch your transitions and edges in your model and definitely "check those units!".

ZCP
www.phoenix-engineer.com

RE: Fluid flow through a nozzle

(OP)
Thanks for the advice!  I got the analysis to run shortly after posting.  It turned out to be a problem with the mesh, as the outlet was extremely narrow.  I added mesh refinement points to ensure two elements covered the width of the outlet.  The analysis ran with no problem following this change.

Thanks again, Jesse

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close